Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/t/modules autoindex.t

2004-01-12 Thread Geoffrey Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nd 2004/01/12 08:04:50 Modified:perl-framework/t/modules autoindex.t not to be a pest, but I still have this patch floating around. if there's no interest I'll just scrap it. --Geoff Index: t/modules/include.t

Fwd: Re: Re: Announcing apache-ppc (embedded)

2004-01-12 Thread daniel . koerner
Hi Sander (and others), I wrote a direct reply which I want to forward. Beware: Embedded Linux is always fighting with the RAM size. (2nd argument) Daniel -- Hi Sander, you wrote: > Is there a specific reason you ported 1.3, instead of using 2.0? No. The reason was simply that on

[PATCH] 2.1: UseCanonicalHostname Off results in erroneous Proxy Via header

2004-01-12 Thread Martin Kraemer
Hello everyone, If the configuration sets UseCanonicalHostname Off and enables the proxy, then the Via: header will report not the proxy hosts's ServerName (or any of its configured VHosts's names) as it should, but the *origin hosts*'s name. Example: if I go thru a local apache-2.1 proxy on

[PATCH] Bugz 24483 for 1.3

2004-01-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Patch to close out Bugz 24483 for 1.3.29... basically a backport of the 2.0 patch in the PR. Index: src/modules/standard/mod_usertrack.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/modules/standard/mod_usertrack.c,v retrieving revision

Re: 2.0.48 worker mpm on RH3 NPTL results

2004-01-12 Thread gregames
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: Attached are 2.0.48 numbers on RH AS 2.1 and 3.0. Apache is build with worker MPM and default options on both versions. Thanks for posting these measurements. I was happy to see that performance stays pretty flat as the system got overloaded. The AS 3.0 8 CPU curve

[1.3 PROPOSAL] call prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE)

2004-01-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
configure-time checks would used to check for availability (certain Linux only); the syscall would be made in the same situations as 2.x (if CoredumpDirectory has been set and we're starting as root) no patch yet, just wondering if anybody objects for some reason and/or there is a chance of

Re: [1.3 PROPOSAL] call prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE)

2004-01-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 ! Jeff Trawick wrote: configure-time checks would used to check for availability (certain Linux only); the syscall would be made in the same situations as 2.x (if CoredumpDirectory has been set and we're starting as root) no patch yet, just wondering if anybody objects for some

[1.3 PATCH] log error if returning 500

2004-01-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
(originally posted to wrong mailing list) ---BeginMessage--- 2.x already does this Index: src/modules/standard/mod_mime_magic.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/modules/standard/mod_mime_magic.c,v retrieving revision 1.51 diff

Re: [1.3 PROPOSAL] call prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE)

2004-01-12 Thread gregames
+1 here too. It's bad enough to have a problem where we need a dump, but much worse when we can't get a dump without jumping thru hoops. Greg Jeff Trawick wrote: configure-time checks would used to check for availability (certain Linux only); the syscall would be made in the same situations

Re: [1.3 PATCH] log error if returning 500

2004-01-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 On Jan 12, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: 2.x already does this Index: src/modules/standard/mod_mime_magic.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/modules/standard/mod_mime_magic.c,v retrieving revision 1.51 diff -u

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server log.c

2004-01-12 Thread Geoffrey Young
+ *) Allow unescaped error logs via compile time switch + -DAP_ERROR_LOG_UNESCAPED. + [Geoffrey Young geoff modperlcookbook.org, André Malo] ah, cool :) if it's all the same to everyone, I actually like joe's suggested -DUNSAFE_LOG_ESCAPING (or some error_log derivitave) a bit

Re: Copyrights

2004-01-12 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Saturday, January 3, 2004, at 11:10 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 06:32 AM 1/2/2004, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: update license to 2004. Why? Unless the file changes in 2004, the copyright doesn't. And, in any case, the earliest date applies, so it gets us nowhere. In fairness

Re: 2.0.48 worker mpm on RH3 NPTL results

2004-01-12 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
What did you use for ThreadsPerChild? The default? yes we used the default values for the worker threading model. I'm very curious to know why prefork is beating worker. Could you get a profile of the CPU usage for both cases? I've had good luck with oprofile. I had a little trouble compiling