This has probably been discussed here before, and if it has I'd
like to know the reasons why it's a bad idea. Anyway, I've been
working on a graceful stop mechanism for httpd, which is
reasonably trivial to work in - the problem is that there are
no portable signal numbers left (or am I wrong in
On 16.01.2004, at 10:30, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:45:01AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote:
Is it really enough to change the component to re-assign a bug to
another project? Shouldn't the 'Assigned To:' field be filled with the
appropriate mailing list address?
Yeah, you have to rememb
and at the moment I see only one way to fix it reliably: Remove it from the
documentation and the code.
(There's also a report w.r.t. the issue:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25725)
Long version:
It could not work, because the hooks where which mod_setenvif is invoked, are
bot
