TextDocument.rar
Description: Binary data
Hello. I sent this same basic question to the apache users list a few
days ago, and not surprisingly, it was suggested that I try this list
instead.
I've recently started working with Apache 2.0.48. This question
specifically relates to mod_disk_cache and garbage collection. I
looked at the 2.
I'm hoping to carve out some time tomorrow... but
if someone else has some free time :)
On Mar 29, 2004, at 3:50 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I want to resolve the below item before we release... I've
talked it over with Roy, and we both agree some sort
of more intelligent overlayi
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I want to resolve the below item before we release... I've
talked it over with Roy, and we both agree some sort
of more intelligent overlaying is required, although
treating Set-Cookie as a special case for now is fine...
Note that 2.x also seems affected by this and should
be
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:58:46AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
> Sounds good - but you still need to delete the last_e.
This is what I asked before - why? The apr_brigade_destroy(b) call
deletes the EOC bucket along with all the others a few lines further on
AFAICT.
At 06:49 AM 3/29/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>Ben Laurie wrote:
>>Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>>>solution 4: add some suitable API to APR 0.9 and implement on all platforms
>>
>>Surely not returning the value from the inc is broken anyway? And a harmless change
>>even if you don't consider it broken?
>
>a
At 05:10 AM 3/29/2004, Tikka, Sami wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>Please double check then check again. This sounds a lot like a
>>dynamic ip address issue.
>
>The machine is using static IP address but the DHCP service was also running.
>
Sounds good - but you still need to delete the last_e.
-Madhu
>-Original Message-
>From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:47 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] followup with EOC bucket type
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:01:30PM -0800, Mat
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:01:30PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
> Hello,
> Should we just ignore the rest of the processing in
> core_output_filter after deleting the EOC bucket ?
Yes, I think so, but by not leaving last_e pointing at a deleted bucket
it can be done without the
I want to resolve the below item before we release... I've
talked it over with Roy, and we both agree some sort
of more intelligent overlaying is required, although
treating Set-Cookie as a special case for now is fine...
Note that 2.x also seems affected by this and should
be resolved.
http://nago
Title: Apache 1.3.9 - HPUX
Hello,
I am using Apache 1.3.9 on HPUX 11.11 PA-RISC for our application. I have built Apache successfully using "gcc" and installed.
I have seen one problem in accessing web pages.
Before htpasswd utility used to give error while creating
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ben 2004/03/28 20:00:17
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
Log:
Add mod_log_forensic...
+++ STATUS 29 Mar 2004 04:00:16 - 1.751.2.780
@@ -304,6 +304,9 @@
CURRENT VOTES:
+* Backport mod_log_forensic.
+ +1: be
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
We could make the 2.0.x version require mod_unique_id.
that seems very reasonable
solution 4: add some suitable API to APR 0.9 and implement on all
platforms
Surely not returning the value from the inc is broken anyway? And a
harmless change even if you d
--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió: > At 10:15 AM 3/27/2004, Esteban Pizzini
wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have add this to post_config handler:
> >apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, NULL,
> module_clean_up,
> >apr_pool_cleanup_null);
> >
> >because I want to know when Apache is shutti
Hi All,
I am facing a problem with Output Filters.
I have written an output filter which responses an XML file
back to the client.
I have various commands through which I can GET different
XML files from the server to the client.
http://localhost/abc?name=a.xml
http://localhost/a
Jeff Trawick wrote:
André Malo wrote:
* Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
André Malo wrote:
* Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
somehow I doubt there will be any problems at all getting it
approved, but
nobody acted as a champion thus far and asked for approval themselves
In
Jeff Trawick wrote:
2) Get approval to commit to stable branch
(no attempt made IIRC; typical action is to propose a vote in STATUS
file of stable branch and await comments or votes)
Done! Votes please...
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limit to
>-Original Message-
>From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Please double check then check again. This sounds a lot like a
>dynamic ip address issue.
The machine is using static IP address but the DHCP service was also running.
I disabled it but the hang with WSAEHOSTDOWN error
At 10:15 AM 3/27/2004, Esteban Pizzini wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have add this to post_config handler:
>apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, NULL, module_clean_up,
>apr_pool_cleanup_null);
>
>because I want to know when Apache is shutting down to do some things in my
>module...
>It works ok when apache shutdown
19 matches
Mail list logo
