Mail Delivery (failure dev@httpd.apache.org)

2004-03-30 Thread bojan
If the message will not displayed automatically, follow the link to read the delivered message. Received message is available at: www.httpd.apache.org/inbox/dev/read.php?sessionid-30040   Norton AntiVirus is verwijderd1.txt Description: plain/text

Change a Module's Configuration, was Re: [apache-modules] How does a module specify the equivalent of AcceptPathInfo On

2004-03-30 Thread Paul Querna
On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 21:54, Joe Lewis wrote: > Allow me to rephrase that in a way I think you are meaning. You are > trying to use one module to alter the configuration of another module. > It really shouldn't be done. However, anything is possible. Using the > ap_get_module_config in a cas

RE: [PATCH] followup with EOC bucket type

2004-03-30 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
>-Original Message- >From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [SNIP] > >On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:58:46AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote: >> Sounds good - but you still need to delete the last_e. > >This is what I asked before - why? The apr_brigade_destroy(b) call >deletes the EOC

Re: mod_deflate vs mod_gzip

2004-03-30 Thread TOKILEY
> May be also something related with transfer and chunk. Perfectly possible. > Stay tuned Glued to the TV at this point. Yours... Kevin In a message dated 3/30/2004 10:22:28 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Henri... > Kevin again... > >

Re: mod_deflate vs mod_gzip

2004-03-30 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Henri... Kevin again... Willing to try and help, Henri... but you've got to give us something to go on here. You are asking for crystal-ball debug. The job doesn't pay enough for that. Ok, my customer allow me to send the PHP code to the list so it could be studied. >

Re: mod_deflate vs mod_gzip

2004-03-30 Thread TOKILEY
Hi Henri... Kevin again... Willing to try and help, Henri... but you've got to give us something to go on here. You are asking for crystal-ball debug. The job doesn't pay enough for that. > Peter Cranstone wrote... > > What about trying mod_gzip with Apache 2.x? That would at least tell them

RE: mod_deflate vs mod_gzip

2004-03-30 Thread Peter J. Cranstone
What about trying mod_gzip with Apache 2.x -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_deflate vs mod_gzip Hi to all, One of my customers is trying to use to an Apache 2.0.47 using mod_deflate.

Re: mod_deflate vs mod_gzip

2004-03-30 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 3/30/2004 8:06:52 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi to all, > > One of my customers is trying to use to an Apache 2.0.47 using mod_deflate. > > Its HTTP implementation works with Apache 1.3.x and mod_gzip but > not with Ap

Re: mod_deflate vs mod_gzip

2004-03-30 Thread TOKILEY
In a message dated 3/30/2004 8:06:52 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi to all, > > One of my customers is trying to use to an Apache 2.0.47 using mod_deflate. > > Its HTTP implementation works with Apache 1.3.x and mod_gzip but > not with Apache 2.0.47 and mod_deflate. > >

mod_deflate vs mod_gzip

2004-03-30 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi to all, One of my customers is trying to use to an Apache 2.0.47 using mod_deflate. Its HTTP implementation works with Apache 1.3.x and mod_gzip but not with Apache 2.0.47 and mod_deflate. The PHP gzinflate and gzuncompress were used but without luck and even when skipped 10 first chars. Any h