Question on mod_proxy and mod_rewrite behaviour when a remote pro xy is unavailable

2004-04-21 Thread CASTELLE Thomas
Title: Question on mod_proxy and mod_rewrite behaviour when a remote proxy is unavailable Hello, I just have a very simple question about the behaviour of mod_proxy and mod_rewrite. Our configuration looks like that :   ServerName www.toto.fr   RewriteEngine On   ProxyRequests Off   Rew

Re: Has mod_dir changed between 2.0.46 and 2.0.49 ?

2004-04-21 Thread Peter Van Biesen
No, I always do a diff on the old files and replay the changes on the new, so normally this should work fine. Peter. Andre' Malo wrote: * Peter Van Biesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I removed the index.jsp from my DirectoryIndex and added it everywhere I know there's one, so now it all seem

Re: Has mod_dir changed between 2.0.46 and 2.0.49 ?

2004-04-21 Thread Peter Van Biesen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I use mod_jk 1.2.5. the entries are : JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 and from the workers file : worker.ajp13.port=8009 worker.ajp13.host=localhost worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 Btw, the ajp connection works fine when the jsp exists, but apparently mod_dir sends ind

Re: Has mod_dir changed between 2.0.46 and 2.0.49 ?

2004-04-21 Thread Glenn Nielsen
mod_jk 1.2.5 was released Sep 30, 2003. Since then there has been at least one patch applied for the Apache 2 version related to the DirectoryIndex. glenn 2003/11/01 11:20:50 Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c Log: Fix a special case to make sure that apache can serve a direc

2.0.49 : mod_ldap = util_ldap.c ?

2004-04-21 Thread Peter Van Biesen
Hi everyone, I've compiled httpd 2.0.49 with mod_auth_ldap and mod_ldap support ( I used --with-ldap=static ). When I do a httpd -l, I can't seem to find mod_ldap in the list. I've been looking through the makefiles and httpd does link with mod_ldap.la which draws in util_ldap.c . So, is mod_ld

[PATCH] mod_log_forensic, BaseAddr.ref

2004-04-21 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, this patch fixes compilation on Win32 for me since older SDK has no unistd.h; and btw. I was also able to compile without unistd.h for NetWare target without warnings about missing prototypes, so maybe its obsolete at all --- mod_log_forensic.c.orig Sat Feb 21 18:15:20 2004 +++ mod_l

[PATCH] RFC: Allow modification/deletion of specific headers in apr_table_t

2004-04-21 Thread Sumeet Singh
Hi, In my use-case I am dealing with multiple headers with the same key (e.g. Cookie), and need to modify or remove a specific header based on its key and value (e.g. remove a certain cookie header while leaving the rest in). There is no api in apr_tables that would allow me to remove a given

Re: 2.0.49 : mod_ldap = util_ldap.c ?

2004-04-21 Thread Edward Rudd
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:44:55 +0200, Peter Van Biesen wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've compiled httpd 2.0.49 with mod_auth_ldap and mod_ldap support ( I > used --with-ldap=static ). When I do a httpd -l, I can't seem to find > mod_ldap in the list. I've been looking through the makefiles and httpd

Re: Bugzilla 28523: ap_set_subreq_protocol not exported on win32.

2004-04-21 Thread Edward Rudd
I've posted this to the bugzilla as bug # 28523 On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 19:02:04 -0500, Edward Rudd wrote: > In the file server/protocol.c (line 983 in httpd-2.0.49) the function > void ap_set-sub_req_protocol(request_rec *rnew, const request_rec *r) > is not exported on win32 builds of apache.. >

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Allow modification/deletion of specific headers in apr_table_t

2004-04-21 Thread Brian Pane
On Apr 21, 2004, at 9:11 AM, Sumeet Singh wrote: Hi, In my use-case I am dealing with multiple headers with the same key (e.g. Cookie), and need to modify or remove a specific header based on its key and value (e.g. remove a certain cookie header while leaving the rest in). There is no api in

Re: multithreaded mpm's and mod_php

2004-04-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-20 09:12:14 +1000]: > but it really depends on what libraries you link in, but yes it does > work if the linked in libraries are thread safe. The reason why I asked is, that we've encountered some problems with mod_php on our metuxmpm (http://www.metu

MPM: threads vs. processes

2004-04-21 Thread Enrico Weigelt
hi folks, probably some of you've noticed, that we're developing our own mpm (http://www.metux.de/mpm/) which runs several vhosts under their own uid. It uses a multiplexer child for receiving the requests from the clients and directing it to the right processor child through socket-passing.

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Apr 21 23:45:07 EDT 2004

2004-04-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/19 18:53:57 $] Release: 1.3.31-dev: In development. Plan to T&R week of April 19. 1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not released. 1.3.29: Tagged October 24, 2003. Announced Oct 29, 2

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Apr 21 23:45:05 EDT 2004

2004-04-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/19 18:53:57 $] Release: 1.3.31-dev: In development. Plan to T&R week of April 19. 1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not released. 1.3.29: Tagged October 24, 2003. Announced Oct 29, 2

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Apr 21 23:45:11 EDT 2004

2004-04-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/21 22:01:32 $] Release: 2.0.50 : in development 2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA. 2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA. 2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA.

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Apr 21 23:45:09 EDT 2004

2004-04-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/21 22:01:32 $] Release: 2.0.50 : in development 2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA. 2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA. 2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA.

[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Apr 21 23:45:15 EDT 2004

2004-04-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/01/04 15:08:00 $] Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]: 2.1.0 : in development Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related proj

[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Apr 21 23:45:13 EDT 2004

2004-04-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/01/04 15:08:00 $] Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]: 2.1.0 : in development Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related proj

Re: 2.0.49 : mod_ldap = util_ldap.c ?

2004-04-21 Thread Peter Van Biesen
Hi, I added LDAPSharedCacheFile ldapCache/sharedCacheFile I created the directory ldapCache under the serverroot and restarted the server. The file sharedCacheFile was created, but with owner root, while the server itself runs under sysadm user ( but apachectl is run by root, to be able to bi