Test::More backend support

2004-04-26 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all I've managed to figure out at least preliminary support for using Test::More as the backend for Apache::Test. attached is a patch as well as a tarball that uses a few Test::More features in it. I may have missed a few of the finer features of Test::More, but it seems to do what I need it

Re: mod_proxy distinguish cookies?

2004-04-26 Thread Graham Leggett
Igor Sysoev wrote: mod_accel ( http://sysoev.ru/en/ ) allows to take cookies into account while caching: AccelCacheCookie some_cookie_name another_cookie_name You can set it on per-location basis. Besides, my upcoming light-weight http and reverse proxy server nginx will allow to do it too.

TR of 1.3.31

2004-04-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
I plan to TR 1.3.31 most likely tomorrow... speak now or forever hold your peace.

Re: TR of 1.3.31

2004-04-26 Thread Geoffrey Young
Jim Jagielski wrote: I plan to TR 1.3.31 most likely tomorrow... speak now or forever hold your peace. I don't think the mod_digest.html stuff I sent was integrated, even though it seemed people were happy with the wording. but I didn't want to just commit it until the RM officially said so

Re: TR of 1.3.31

2004-04-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Apr 26, 2004, at 1:42 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote: I don't think the mod_digest.html stuff I sent was integrated, even though it seemed people were happy with the wording. but I didn't want to just commit it until the RM officially said so :) not that these docs are all that critical of an

Re: Proposal: AP_FTYPE_PREPROCESS

2004-04-26 Thread Paul Querna
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 19:25, Nick Kew wrote: Rather than use hacks like AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE-1, would it not be better to introduce a new output filter type AP_FTYPE_PREPROCESS below RESOURCE for this kind of application? Originally I didn't think this was good; rather that ordering of filters

Re: Proposal: AP_FTYPE_PREPROCESS

2004-04-26 Thread Sumeet Singh
Paul Querna wrote: On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 19:25, Nick Kew wrote: Rather than use hacks like AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE-1, would it not be better to introduce a new output filter type AP_FTYPE_PREPROCESS below RESOURCE for this kind of application? Originally I didn't think this was good; rather