Re: Request for feedback - UseCanonicalPort

2004-05-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim, would you post a chart of the now-three proposed behaviors, with the various effects broken out? It would help us all understand why we need a third way. Bill At 02:53 PM 5/11/2004, you wrote: IMO, we need more control over the port number that Apache determines to be canonical beyond that

Re: Request for feedback - UseCanonicalPort

2004-05-11 Thread Brad Nicholes
+1 to Bill's comment. I don't quite understand what is confusing and why we would need UseCanonicalPort. IMO, all that really needs to be done is to fix UseCanonicalName so that it works according to the documentation. As was explained previously, when UseCanonicalName is OFF, both 1.3 and 2.1

OCSP addition

2004-05-11 Thread Hotmail
Hello, I plan to add OCSP support to mod_ssl. I have the code for the OCSP check, but I'd like to check the integration with everybody, as I will give the code back to you - if you're interesting in it :-) Here is what I currently plan: 1. Add a parameter UseOCSP in the config file 2. In

Re: [mp2 patch] getting APR to work w/o modperl

2004-05-11 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: On Sun, 9 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Yes, that sounds like a much better idea. There should be a way to tell the application that certain symbols will be resolved at run-time, and no matter who will provide them (application, another library or else). On AIX the linker is

Re: expires in redirects

2004-05-11 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On May 10, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Brian Akins wrote: Any reason why expires set by mod_expires are not added to redirected requests? Should I hack up my own expires that does? Thats a bug! Either file it in the bug database - or propose a patch. I would expect that that some of the prev/next

RE: OCSP addition

2004-05-11 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
-Original Message- From: Hotmail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [SNIP] I have the code for the OCSP check, but I'd like to check the integration with everybody, as I will give the code back to you - if you're interesting in it :-) Great ! [SNIP] Is somebody interesting in testing that

Re: Apache 1.3.31 RC Tarballs available

2004-05-11 Thread Kean Johnston
I'd like to announce and release the 11th. Are we still on track for this? Reports seem to have been good ... Kean

[PATCH 1.3] New UseCanonicalName option

2004-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
One way of handling the diffs between how 1.3 and 2.0 handles UCN Off. Index: src/CHANGES === RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/CHANGES,v retrieving revision 1.1939 diff -u -r1.1939 CHANGES --- src/CHANGES 7 May 2004 14:43:04 -

Re: [PATCH 1.3] New UseCanonicalName option

2004-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 11, 2004, at 12:28 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: One way of handling the diffs between how 1.3 and 2.0 handles UCN Off. *) SECURITY: CAN-2003-0987 (cve.mitre.org) Index: src/include/ap_mmn.h === RCS file:

Re: OCSP addition

2004-05-11 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On May 11, 2004 02:23 am, Hotmail wrote: I plan to add OCSP support to mod_ssl. Cool, this will probably make quite a few people happy(ier). [snip] 3. In ssl_callback_SSLVerify_Validity( ): - if the parameter UseOCSP is on, try an OCSP check - if the OCSP check failed because the

Removal of Server and Date HTTP headers

2004-05-11 Thread Efri Nattel-Shay
My module (for Apache 2.x, I'm using the 2.0.47 code) needs to check the Server HTTP response header. {bg info begin this is to see if a proxy module running before me had changed it. bg info end} So I hook using ap_hook_log_transaction(), and in there I check r-headers_out for Server. But it's

Request for feedback - UseCanonicalPort

2004-05-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
IMO, we need more control over the port number that Apache determines to be canonical beyond that which is provided by UseCanonicalName, simply because there are so many options and permutations which are possible and applicable for different environments. To that end, instead of overloading