Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
It's a bug in mod_xslt, if that module trys to set aside a transient bucket. Bill At 12:09 AM 5/19/2004, Stas Bekman wrote: We have the following situation in mod_perl 2 land: we use the same buffer to allocate data in buckets which are passed to the filters. That bucket is created once per

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Stas Bekman
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It's a bug in mod_xslt, if that module trys to set aside a transient bucket. Ah, cool, for some reason I thought that transient still has to have a copy :) Thanks Bill! At 12:09 AM 5/19/2004, Stas Bekman wrote: We have the following situation in mod_perl 2 land: we

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: extra allocation happens). But just now one user has reported that it breaks mod_xslt filter, which sets aside the buckets sent from the modperl handler, and then uses them after seeing EOS. That seems to me an unnecessarily complex and inefficient XSLT

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Paul Querna
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 07:38 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: We have at least one implementation that works like that (originally mine, but now more actively developed by others as mod_transform). Perhaps mod_perl users might benefit from switching? Currently it is only in a Subversion Repo:

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Nick Kew wrote: On Tue, 18 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: extra allocation happens). But just now one user has reported that it breaks mod_xslt filter, which sets aside the buckets sent from the modperl handler, and then uses them after seeing EOS. That seems to me an unnecessarily complex and

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Frankly I even have no idea who is the author of mod_xslt, it's not part of the mod_perl project. There are several modules with that name. When you raised it as a problem you had encountered with mod_perl, I thought maybe mod_perl had specific hooks

HELP : File Descriptor -- URGENT

2004-05-19 Thread sonam . singh
Hi This is my first message to the mailling list. I am runnig the apache1.3.29+Vignette5.0 at solaris 8.0 . Whenever I hup the apache file descriptor gets increased by 2 . But before the hup, no of descriptor are 260 or 256 . After hupped the descriptor become 262 .After certain period

Re: HELP : File Descriptor -- URGENT

2004-05-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is my first message to the mailling list. I am runnig the apache1.3.29+Vignette5.0 at solaris 8.0 . Whenever I hup the apache file descriptor gets increased by 2 . But before the hup, no of descriptor are 260 or 256 . After hupped the descriptor become 262 .After

Any plans for 2.0.50 ?

2004-05-19 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, I just found that SSL is on Win32 broken with Apache 2.0.49 on NT, 2K and XP: when I stop Apache2 after an ssl request was made it segfaults. I checked with recent 2.1-dev and 2.0.50-dev and seems this issue is there fixed. Also there's a minor issue with the standard ssl.conf file which has

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 19 May 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It's a bug in mod_xslt, if that module trys to set aside a transient bucket. Huh? No it isn't. Half of the reason setaside() even exists is to handle transient buckets. static apr_status_t transient_bucket_setaside(apr_bucket *b, apr_pool_t

Re: Any plans for 2.0.50 ?

2004-05-19 Thread Jess Holle
Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, I just found that SSL is on Win32 broken with Apache 2.0.49 on NT, 2K and XP: when I stop Apache2 after an ssl request was made it segfaults. I checked with recent 2.1-dev and 2.0.50-dev and seems this issue is there fixed. This is an old bug that has been around for

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Cliff Woolley wrote: Note: ap_save_brigade() handles the setaside and brigade concatenation for you. I suspect there are a number of places in the code that we are incorrectly calling APR_BRIGADE_CONCAT() instead of ap_save_brigade(). That's bug city right there. Worse,

gdb 6.1, Apache2.0.49, ctrl-c

2004-05-19 Thread listman
I'm using gdb 6.1 apache2.0.49 built from source using CFLAGS=-O0 ./configure --prefix=/opt/apache2-2.0.48 --enable-ssl --enable-maintainer-mode --with-mpm=worker on debian I run apache in gdb with -X -f myconf.conf when I attempt to stop execution by pressing ctrl-c inside gdb execution stops

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 08:33 AM 5/19/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Wed, 19 May 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It's a bug in mod_xslt, if that module trys to set aside a transient bucket. Huh? No it isn't. Half of the reason setaside() even exists is to handle transient buckets. I didn't say setaside(), and

Apache 1.3 to be moved to SVN

2004-05-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
I believe that we've rec'd quite a few +1s on the issue of moving apache-1.3 to subversion and no -1s. Let's give it a few more days, but unless we hear otherwise, we should consider making it official Monday or so (the 24th). At that point, we can ask the infrastructure team to perform the

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Cliff Woolley wrote: can't just ignore APR_ENOTIMPL for bucket types, because pipe and socket buckets never had setaside implemented on them. I thought I remembered that that was because Greg and Ryan and I had some huge debate about it and it was decided for some reason

location for raw list archives

2004-05-19 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, I was just looking for the raw list archives so that I can setup my own server with mod_mbox; first I found that the mod_mbox link on http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html to http://nagoya.apache.org:/ doesnt work. Then I wonder that there are only a few lists available; I can find

Re: location for raw list archives

2004-05-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Guenter Knauf wrote: I was just looking for the raw list archives so that I can setup my own server with mod_mbox; first I found that the mod_mbox link on http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html to http://nagoya.apache.org:/ doesnt work. Then I wonder that there are only a

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Wed, 19 May 2004, Cliff Woolley wrote: can't just ignore APR_ENOTIMPL for bucket types, because pipe and socket buckets never had setaside implemented on them. I thought I remembered that that was because Greg and Ryan and I had some huge debate about it and it was

Re: gdb 6.1, Apache2.0.49, ctrl-c

2004-05-19 Thread listman
listman wrote: So after a little hunting I placed #ifdef SIGINT sigdelset(sig_mask, SIGINT); #endif inside static void remove_sync_sigs(sigset_t *sig_mask) in threadproc/unix/signals.c this unblocks the SIGINT so that it can be used in gdb by ctrl-c I can understand why you might want to

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Wed, 19 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: And a lot of pain and wasted time could be saved if all this was documented. I know. :( I'm not aware of such documentation's existance, besides very scarce notes in the header files. The best documentation that exists, besides

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: And a lot of pain and wasted time could be saved if all this was documented. I know. :( I'm not aware of such documentation's existance, besides very scarce notes in the header files. The best documentation that exists, besides what's in the header

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed May 19 23:45:09 EDT 2004

2004-05-19 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/05/07 14:43:04 $] Release: 1.3.32-dev: In development 1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. 1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not released. 1.3.29: Tagged October 24, 2003. Announced Oct 29,

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed May 19 23:45:14 EDT 2004

2004-05-19 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/05/17 14:13:49 $] Release: 2.0.50 : in development 2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA. 2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA. 2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA.

[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed May 19 23:45:18 EDT 2004

2004-05-19 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/27 22:09:17 $] Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]: 2.1.0 : in development Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related

Re: is it possible to mark buckets to be copied only when to be set-aside?

2004-05-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: I'm sure Cliff and other filter gurus For the record, I make no claims as to being a filter guru. Some parts of the filtering system baffle me as much as anybody else. I know buckets. I more or less leave the filtering to somebody else. :) will be