Jeff Trawick wrote:
This patch did it:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apache-1.3/src/main/http_request.c?r1=1.173r2=1.174
Backing out the patch also fixes a DAV regression. See
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29237
See also
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:14:30AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
This patch did it:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apache-1.3/src/main/http_request.c?r1=1.173r2=1.174
Backing out the patch also fixes a DAV regression. See
Hmm.. this was a patch suggested by Rasmus, iirc.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
This patch did it:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apache-1.3/src/main/http_request.c?r1=1.173r2=1.174
Backing out the patch also fixes a DAV regression. See
I've backed out that patch and asked Rasmus to send a replacemnet
which addresses his specific problem but does not cause
the below behavior.
I'm tempted to release 1.3.32...
Jeff Trawick wrote:
This patch did it:
Folks,
I think a recent fix for proxypass with ftp broke non-anonymous proxying of
FTP, in
the Apache 1.3 proxy module.
That fix for proxypass, took out the use of the parsed uri data in the
request structure,
and instead opted to parse out the FTP request explicitly. This is fine,
but the
[Another patch already in use, to be applied Tuesday unless
someone speaks up.]
We've found cases where XtOffsetOf is already defined on some
platforms - we have no business overriding this (if we wanted our
own flavor, it aught to have been AP_ prefixed :-)
Bill
#
# Some platforms have an
I'd worked with some interesting java and cgi code which implements
proxy behavior, as opposed to using a compiled-in module such as
mod_proxy. In order to properly pass on the Server: and Date: headers
(which are owned by the origin server), this patch tests for the presence
of a Via: header,
I made a post on the 20th about this bug report.. And there is now a new
patch available that Andre and I worked on that solves all the issues that
I mentioned before in regards to static/prelinked modules.
The patch IDs are 11685 and 11690, posted on 5/27 and 5/28
respectively. I would like
At 07:09 AM 5/28/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've backed out that patch and asked Rasmus to send a replacemnet
which addresses his specific problem but does not cause
the below behavior.
I'm tempted to release 1.3.32...
Collect another week or few of data on other problems first, perhaps?
Once
