Hi,
i got this mail:
---
On Die 01.06.2004 23:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
htmlbody
Dear user of bApache.org/b,br
br
Your e-mail account has been temporary disabled because of unauthorized
access.brbr
Further details can be obtained from attached file.br
br
Best wishes,br
nbsp; nbsp; The
I'm working on a fix for #12355, the (infamous?) per-directory SSL
renegotiation vs request with bodies bug. The issue is explained at
length in ssl_engine_kernel.c; simply put: if an SSLRequire is specified
in a directory/location context, it's necessary to perform an SSL
handshake *after* the
g g wrote:
I am trying to install Apache 2.0.49 on AIX 5.2 with proxy module enabled. I am
build the source code using following options:
1)configure --prefix=Location --enable-so --enable-proxy
2)make
3)make install
After the installation is complete, if we try to look for
Hi Sander,
Thanks alot. The option suggested by you worked fine.
Regards,
GaganSander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 1, 2004, at 5:29 PM, g g wrote: Any pointers to why mod_proxy.so module is not getting generated in apache2049 on AIX. I am building the source code with required
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 04:53:12PM +0100, Dermot Tynan wrote:
I'm at Witts End (twisty passages everwhere!). I have
written an authentication module as a DSO for Apache 2.0.48
I run FreeBSD here and it works just fine. I move the
source over to a SuSE 9.0 box where Apache 2.0.48 has
been
* Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If an ErrorHeader is defined, shouldn't it only be included on
non-200 http responses (ie. only on 3xx,4xx,5xx responses as the
documentation states)?
No. The documentation states:
| This directive can replace, merge or remove HTTP response headers
On Jun 2, 2004, at 12:40 PM, Brian Akins wrote:
AFAIK, the linux x86 atomic stuff can be used unchanged on Linux
x86_64. This is based on my digging in the kernel source. All the
functions apr uses are identical.
Should I submit a patch?
Sure, sounds like a good thing to add.
Thanks,
Brian
Greetings,
modules.apache.org (MAO) has housed a listing for Apache Modules for
several years now. In #apache-modules on Freenode IRC we have had many
discussions on how to improve the limited focus of the current MAO
website. Our goal is to build a new Apache Modules website using a
Hi,
Developing Modules: An area of general weakness for HTTPd is the lack of
developer documentation. The current website has a few links to mostly
outdated documents. We plan to address this audience in two thrusts.
First, provide concise tutorials by using simple modules to help people
On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 04:36:07 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:
We are looking for feedback on our plans. What do you want to see on a
new modules website? What features are important to you? What hurdles
do you see to a successfully replacement? What other audiences should
we try to address?
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/05/20 15:16:42 $]
Release:
1.3.32-dev: In development
1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. Announced May 11, 2004.
1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not released.
1.3.29: Tagged October 24,
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/06/03 01:50:15 $]
Release:
2.0.50 : in development
2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA.
2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA.
2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA.
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/27 22:09:17 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related
13 matches
Mail list logo
