On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 03:38:18PM +0300, EMRE KUNT (Ebi Bsk. - Sistem Prog) wrote:
> Hi,
> Apache 2049 for HPUX - Openssl 097d.
> Some Clients use Internet Explorer 50 and they face "The page cannot be
> displayed" on SSL pages. At this time messages below appears in Apache log.
> What is the prob
* "Jean-Jacques Clar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>trawick: is minor mmn bump needed to reflect that API structure
> was extended? Should the mmn be bumped up or not?Minor bump is to inform
> developers that something has changed that they should be aware of. What
> else?Will people that ar
André Malo wrote:
* "Jean-Jacques Clar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
trawick: is minor mmn bump needed to reflect that API structure
was extended? Should the mmn be bumped up or not?Minor bump is to inform
developers that something has changed that they should be aware of. What
else?Will peopl
* Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If Apache adds new field to end of request_rec, that is minor bump, correct?
> Existing modules should continue to work unchanged but modules can choose to
> look at MMN at compile time to see they are being built to work with newer
> Apache and can look
Attached is patch add a new command line option to httpd:
'-t -D DUMP_MODULES'
This will print a list of all loaded shared modules and all statically
compiled modules.
My only question is, what should the command be called?
'-t -D DUMP_MODULES' vs '-M' vs some other argument.
I based DUMP_MODUL
