Q about adding new doc file

2004-08-26 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Please help a fresh commiter explaining how to add the new doc file. What files do I need to add for a new manual entry (mod_proxy_balancer)? I know that the .xml is needed, but what about .meta, .html.xx? Can someone explain the procedure? Regards, MT. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptogra

Re: Q about adding new doc file

2004-08-26 Thread André Malo
* Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please help a fresh commiter explaining how to add the new doc file. > What files do I need to add for a new manual entry (mod_proxy_balancer)? Such questions are better handled on the docs list :-) > I know that the .xml is needed, but what about .meta

Re: Q about adding new doc file

2004-08-26 Thread Mladen Turk
André Malo wrote: Please help a fresh commiter explaining how to add the new doc file. What files do I need to add for a new manual entry (mod_proxy_balancer)? Such questions are better handled on the docs list :-) I should know :). (Oh, and if someone could document mod_proxy_ajp, that would be g

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES

2004-08-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 26 Aug 2004 13:03:06 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jorton 2004/08/26 06:03:06 > > Modified:.CHANGES > Log: > Synch with 2.0 branch. > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.1568+9 -1 httpd-2.0/CHANGES > > Index: CHANGES > ==

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ldap util_ldap.c

2004-08-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 26 Aug 2004 15:24:51 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bnicholes2004/08/26 08:24:51 > > Modified:modules/ldap util_ldap.c > Log: > Preserve the return value from the apr_stat() call so that it can be displayed in > the error log message. >{ >

Time for 2.0.51 and 2.1.0

2004-08-26 Thread Sander Striker
Hi, I'm going to start a T&R cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday. Objections? Sander

Re: Time for 2.0.51 and 2.1.0

2004-08-26 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Thursday, August 26, 2004 7:08 PM +0200 Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm going to start a T&R cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday. Objections? Vote early and often for APR 1.0 so that 2.1 can use an official 1.0 release of APR. ;-) -- justin

Re: Time for 2.0.51 and 2.1.0

2004-08-26 Thread Bill Stoddard
Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'm going to start a T&R cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday. Objections? Sander Got a few 2.0 backports from 2.1 I need to drum up support for but otherwise +1 Bill

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental cache_storage.c cache_util.c mod_cache.c mod_cache.h mod_

2004-08-26 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Should the type for refcount be apr_atomic_t instead of apr_uint32_t?   It does not build currently for NetWare. JJ>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/26/04 10:59 AM >>> stoddard    2004/08/26 09:59:46  Index: mod_cache.h  ===  RCS file: /home/

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental cache_storage.c cache_util.c mod_cache.c mod_cache.h mod_

2004-08-26 Thread Bill Stoddard
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: Should the type for refcount be apr_atomic_t instead of apr_uint32_t? It does not build currently for NetWare. JJ >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/26/04 10:59 AM >>> stoddard2004/08/26 09:59:46 Index: mod_cache.h =

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

2004-08-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 26 Aug 2004 18:04:20 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -*) Allocate buffer memory from the temp_pool rather than the stack to > - avoid over-running a fixed length stack while evaluating nested > - include directives. > - server/config.c: r1.1

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental cache_storage.c cache_util.c mod_cache.c mod_cache.h

2004-08-26 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
>I can make that change. Is this the only netware breakage? Yes, this is the only one. Thanks, JJ

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES

2004-08-26 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Thursday, August 26, 2004 6:30 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stoddard2004/08/26 11:30:42 Modified:.CHANGES Log: Give Brian and Justin credit for code backported into 2.0. Is this really the only CHANGES entry in 2.1 for cache? Yup. I didn't want to put a CHANGES entr

Re: [PATCH] lingering close thread for worker

2004-08-26 Thread Joe Schaefer
Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The concept of multiplexing apache's lingering > close comes from lingerd, but I thought it'd be > interesting to try the same thing for worker with > a dedicated closer thread. The patch is intended to improve worker's scaling characteristics without

Re: [PATCH] lingering close thread for worker

2004-08-26 Thread Bill Stoddard
Joe Schaefer wrote: Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The concept of multiplexing apache's lingering close comes from lingerd, but I thought it'd be interesting to try the same thing for worker with a dedicated closer thread. The patch is intended to improve worker's scaling characteris

Re: [PATCH] lingering close thread for worker

2004-08-26 Thread Joe Schaefer
Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > I almost wonder if a large number of requests are actually failing in > the patched case under high load... Me too, but there are no failed requests reported by ab: /usr/local/apache2/bin/ab -n 1 -c 1000 http://localhost/ This is ApacheBench

Re: Time for 2.0.51 and 2.1.0

2004-08-26 Thread Brad Nicholes
Same here. I need another vote for the util_ldap.c backport Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, August 26, 2004 11:21:22 AM >>> Sander Striker wrote: > Hi, > > I'm goin

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_cgi.c

2004-08-26 Thread André Malo
* Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I have no time to spend on it. From a quick look at the code, it > seems that it is possible for the errfn to log header fields which is why I > choose to escape the string. Sure... > Why wouldn't you want to escape the string just > to be safe