Hi,
Please help a fresh commiter explaining how to add the new doc file.
What files do I need to add for a new manual entry (mod_proxy_balancer)?
I know that the .xml is needed, but what about .meta, .html.xx?
Can someone explain the procedure?
Regards,
MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptogra
* Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please help a fresh commiter explaining how to add the new doc file.
> What files do I need to add for a new manual entry (mod_proxy_balancer)?
Such questions are better handled on the docs list :-)
> I know that the .xml is needed, but what about .meta
André Malo wrote:
Please help a fresh commiter explaining how to add the new doc file.
What files do I need to add for a new manual entry (mod_proxy_balancer)?
Such questions are better handled on the docs list :-)
I should know :).
(Oh, and if someone could document mod_proxy_ajp, that would be g
On 26 Aug 2004 13:03:06 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jorton 2004/08/26 06:03:06
>
> Modified:.CHANGES
> Log:
> Synch with 2.0 branch.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.1568+9 -1 httpd-2.0/CHANGES
>
> Index: CHANGES
> ==
On 26 Aug 2004 15:24:51 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bnicholes2004/08/26 08:24:51
>
> Modified:modules/ldap util_ldap.c
> Log:
> Preserve the return value from the apr_stat() call so that it can be displayed in
> the error log message.
>{
>
Hi,
I'm going to start a T&R cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday.
Objections?
Sander
--On Thursday, August 26, 2004 7:08 PM +0200 Sander Striker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm going to start a T&R cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday.
Objections?
Vote early and often for APR 1.0 so that 2.1 can use an official 1.0 release
of APR. ;-) -- justin
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to start a T&R cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday.
Objections?
Sander
Got a few 2.0 backports from 2.1 I need to drum up support for but otherwise +1
Bill
Should the type for refcount be apr_atomic_t instead of apr_uint32_t?
It does not build currently for NetWare.
JJ>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/26/04 10:59 AM >>>
stoddard 2004/08/26 09:59:46 Index: mod_cache.h === RCS file: /home/
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Should the type for refcount be apr_atomic_t instead of apr_uint32_t?
It does not build currently for NetWare.
JJ
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/26/04 10:59 AM >>>
stoddard2004/08/26 09:59:46
Index: mod_cache.h
=
On 26 Aug 2004 18:04:20 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -*) Allocate buffer memory from the temp_pool rather than the stack to
> - avoid over-running a fixed length stack while evaluating nested
> - include directives.
> - server/config.c: r1.1
>I can make that change. Is this the only netware breakage?
Yes, this is the only one.
Thanks,
JJ
--On Thursday, August 26, 2004 6:30 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stoddard2004/08/26 11:30:42
Modified:.CHANGES
Log:
Give Brian and Justin credit for code backported into 2.0. Is this really
the only CHANGES entry in 2.1 for cache?
Yup. I didn't want to put a CHANGES entr
Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The concept of multiplexing apache's lingering
> close comes from lingerd, but I thought it'd be
> interesting to try the same thing for worker with
> a dedicated closer thread.
The patch is intended to improve worker's scaling
characteristics without
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The concept of multiplexing apache's lingering
close comes from lingerd, but I thought it'd be
interesting to try the same thing for worker with
a dedicated closer thread.
The patch is intended to improve worker's scaling
characteris
Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I almost wonder if a large number of requests are actually failing in
> the patched case under high load...
Me too, but there are no failed requests reported by ab:
/usr/local/apache2/bin/ab -n 1 -c 1000 http://localhost/
This is ApacheBench
Same here. I need another vote for the util_ldap.c backport
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, August 26, 2004 11:21:22 AM >>>
Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm goin
* Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I have no time to spend on it. From a quick look at the code, it
> seems that it is possible for the errfn to log header fields which is why I
> choose to escape the string.
Sure...
> Why wouldn't you want to escape the string just
> to be safe
18 matches
Mail list logo