Let's continue this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] since it doesn't seem like there's an
httpd bug currently.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:49:29PM -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > when it did start up it would segfault consistently when running the
> > tests
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 06:13, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Probably not worth it given all of the parallel development.
> >
> > Well, I'd rather see us using something like this:
> >
> > httpd/
> > apreq/
> > trunk/
> > branches/
> >
Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 06:13, Joe Schaefer wrote:
[...]
> > apreq/branches/1.3
> >
> > and httpd-apreq-2 cvs can go to apreq/trunk.
>
> *nod*
Correction: apreq/branches/1.x
We've already released libapreq-1.3, and since we're
still maintaining tha
Comments anyone?
Seeing all +1's and no objections, I'm planning to push this out
in the next hour or two.
Bill
Apache HTTP Server 2.0.52 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and the The Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the release of version 2.0.52
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Comments anyone?
Seeing all +1's and no objections, I'm planning to push this out
in the next hour or two.
The ?update argument to download.cgi should be changed to the date/time
that you drop the files into dist/httpd/. And you should try to wait
Is the final 2.0.52 identical to httpd-2.0.52-rc1.tar.gz (including
version strings, etc)?
[Just anxious to get cracking on 2.0.52 binaries.]
--
Jess Holle
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Comments anyone?
Seeing all +1's and no objections, I'm planning to push this out
in the next hour or tw
At 02:55 PM 9/27/2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>>Comments anyone?
>>
>>Seeing all +1's and no objections, I'm planning to push this out
>>in the next hour or two.
>
>The ?update argument to download.cgi should be changed to the date/time that you dro
At 03:07 PM 9/27/2004, Jess Holle wrote:
>Is the final 2.0.52 identical to httpd-2.0.52-rc1.tar.gz (including version strings,
>etc)?
>
>[Just anxious to get cracking on 2.0.52 binaries.]
Yes you can start building binaries, and push them as soon as the
.tar.gz hits /dist/httpd, although they ar
Hi,
I have successfully chrooted Apache 2 and everything works pretty well.
Unfortunately I can't get it working with mod_auth_digest because I always
end up getting the following error message:
[Mon Sep 27 20:13:35 2004] [crit] (2)No such file or directory: Digest: error
generating secret: No
Joe Orton wrote:
Let's continue this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] since it doesn't seem like there's an
httpd bug currently.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:49:29PM -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
when it did start up it would segfault consistently when running the
tests
10 matches
Mail list logo