Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 1 Oct 2004 16:03:09 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfclere 2004/10/01 09:03:09
Modified:os config.m4
os/unix os.h unixd.c
Log:
Move the few BS2000 specific in unixd.c
Index: unixd.c
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:35:47 +0200, jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 1 Oct 2004 16:03:09 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfclere 2004/10/01 09:03:09
Modified:os config.m4
os/unix os.h unixd.c
Log:
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__ Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:05:29PM -0400:
If you haven't already, please grab 1.3.32-dev HEAD and
test it out.
Sorry for the delay...
I built and tested successfully on;
- Red Hat Linux 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, 9.0
- Fedora Core 1 2 Linux
- Red Hat
Hi,
I have prepared a patch to use apr-iconv instead GNU or system iconv.
Find it enclosed.
Any comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Index: buildconf
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/buildconf,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u
Hi all,
as some people here are already talking about Apache 2.2, just a short question:
Will there ever be a productive version of Apache 2.1 or is it planned to
rename the current Apache 2.1-dev into Apache 2.2.0 as soon as Apache 2.1-dev is
regarded feature complete and its code having a
Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
Hi all,
as some people here are already talking about Apache 2.2, just a short
question:
Will there ever be a productive version of Apache 2.1 or is it planned to
rename the current Apache 2.1-dev into Apache 2.2.0 as soon as Apache
2.1-dev is
regarded feature complete and
On Oct 1, 2004, at 9:05 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If you haven't already, please grab 1.3.32-dev HEAD and
test it out. I'd like some additional good feedback
before I commit to a TR. As such, I'd like to
impose a on-hold policy for any more code commits.
Darwin MonaLisa 7.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version
At 12:00 PM 10/4/2004, Jean-Frederic wrote:
I have prepared a patch to use apr-iconv instead GNU or system iconv.
I'm not hearing alot of interest in maintaining apr-iconv, and
instead perhaps using the BSD port iconv-2.0 for Win32 and non
iconv platforms.
What are other people's thoughts on
--On Monday, October 4, 2004 6:05 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:00 PM 10/4/2004, Jean-Frederic wrote:
I have prepared a patch to use apr-iconv instead GNU or system iconv.
I'm not hearing alot of interest in maintaining apr-iconv, and
instead perhaps using the BSD
At 06:38 PM 10/4/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I have some issues with the proposed patch in that it moves some configure logic that
really belongs in apr-util over to httpd: i.e. configuration of apr-iconv should be
done by apr-util not by httpd, httpd should only be aware of iconv via the
10 matches
Mail list logo