Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/os/unix os.h unixd.c

2004-10-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
Jeff Trawick wrote: On 1 Oct 2004 16:03:09 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jfclere 2004/10/01 09:03:09 Modified:os config.m4 os/unix os.h unixd.c Log: Move the few BS2000 specific in unixd.c Index: unixd.c

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/os/unix os.h unixd.c

2004-10-04 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:35:47 +0200, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: On 1 Oct 2004 16:03:09 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jfclere 2004/10/01 09:03:09 Modified:os config.m4 os/unix os.h unixd.c Log:

Re: Time to test...

2004-10-04 Thread Chip Cuccio
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] |__ Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:05:29PM -0400: If you haven't already, please grab 1.3.32-dev HEAD and test it out. Sorry for the delay... I built and tested successfully on; - Red Hat Linux 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, 9.0 - Fedora Core 1 2 Linux - Red Hat

PATCH to use apr-iconv

2004-10-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, I have prepared a patch to use apr-iconv instead GNU or system iconv. Find it enclosed. Any comments? Cheers Jean-Frederic Index: buildconf === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/buildconf,v retrieving revision 1.44 diff -u

Roadmap Apache 2.1 / 2.2

2004-10-04 Thread Rüdiger Plüm
Hi all, as some people here are already talking about Apache 2.2, just a short question: Will there ever be a productive version of Apache 2.1 or is it planned to rename the current Apache 2.1-dev into Apache 2.2.0 as soon as Apache 2.1-dev is regarded feature complete and its code having a

Re: Roadmap Apache 2.1 / 2.2

2004-10-04 Thread Paul Querna
Rüdiger Plüm wrote: Hi all, as some people here are already talking about Apache 2.2, just a short question: Will there ever be a productive version of Apache 2.1 or is it planned to rename the current Apache 2.1-dev into Apache 2.2.0 as soon as Apache 2.1-dev is regarded feature complete and

Re: Time to test...

2004-10-04 Thread Sander Temme
On Oct 1, 2004, at 9:05 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: If you haven't already, please grab 1.3.32-dev HEAD and test it out. I'd like some additional good feedback before I commit to a TR. As such, I'd like to impose a on-hold policy for any more code commits. Darwin MonaLisa 7.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version

Re: PATCH to use apr-iconv

2004-10-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:00 PM 10/4/2004, Jean-Frederic wrote: I have prepared a patch to use apr-iconv instead GNU or system iconv. I'm not hearing alot of interest in maintaining apr-iconv, and instead perhaps using the BSD port iconv-2.0 for Win32 and non iconv platforms. What are other people's thoughts on

Re: PATCH to use apr-iconv

2004-10-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Monday, October 4, 2004 6:05 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 12:00 PM 10/4/2004, Jean-Frederic wrote: I have prepared a patch to use apr-iconv instead GNU or system iconv. I'm not hearing alot of interest in maintaining apr-iconv, and instead perhaps using the BSD

Re: PATCH to use apr-iconv

2004-10-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:38 PM 10/4/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: I have some issues with the proposed patch in that it moves some configure logic that really belongs in apr-util over to httpd: i.e. configuration of apr-iconv should be done by apr-util not by httpd, httpd should only be aware of iconv via the