-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 18:49, André Malo wrote:
> > I want to use SSI with CGI scripts. Thus, I have configured the INCLUDES
> > filter for my cgi-bin. But my CGI scripts generate not only text/html
> > documents. Hence my problem, I want to say
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/09/03 02:47:19 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related proj
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/10/19 00:07:54 $]
Release:
2.0.53 : in development
2.0.52 : released September 28, 2005 as GA.
2.0.51 : released September 15, 2004 as GA.
2.0.50 : released June 30, 2004 a
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/10/18 16:40:39 $]
Release:
1.3.33-dev: In development
1.3.32: Tagged October 18, 2004.
1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. Announced May 11, 2004.
1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not relea
On October 20, 2004 02:44 am, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote:
> If ppl think it'll be a good addition to Apache, I can clean it up and
> try to commit it sometime tomorrow.
Did the control-command support ever make it into a cvs-worthy form?
That's a far more general way to squash this issue. I coul
On Oct 20, 2004, at 8:50 AM, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote:
The one concern is that if we end up exporting both _DN and _2253DN
formats, it'll have a performance impact on Apache. As it stands now,
Apache is around 50% slower than Zeus (even with SPECweb2003).
SPECWeb99 doesn't require any SSL enviro
* Torsten Förtsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to use SSI with CGI scripts. Thus, I have configured the INCLUDES
> filter for my cgi-bin. But my CGI scripts generate not only text/html
> documents. Hence my problem, I want to say mod_include to handle only
> documents with content-type t
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:02:19 +0100, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 08:50:50AM -0700, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote:
> > The one concern is that if we end up exporting both _DN and _2253DN
> > formats, it'll have a performance impact on Apache. As it stands now,
> > Apa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I want to use SSI with CGI scripts. Thus, I have configured the INCLUDES
filter for my cgi-bin. But my CGI scripts generate not only text/html
documents. Hence my problem, I want to say mod_include to handle only
documents with content-type tex
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 08:50:50AM -0700, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote:
> The one concern is that if we end up exporting both _DN and _2253DN
> formats, it'll have a performance impact on Apache. As it stands now,
> Apache is around 50% slower than Zeus (even with SPECweb2003).
Is that with +StdEnv
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:37:01 +0100, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 12:13:14AM -0700, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:58:57 +0100, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Changing just the _DN variable format with a config directive sounds O
Graham Leggett wrote:
Roman Gavrilov wrote:
In my opinion it would be more efficient to let one process complete
the request (using maximum line throughput) and return some busy code
to other identical, simultaneous requests until the file is cached
locally.
As anyone run into a similar situati
Roman Gavrilov wrote:
In my opinion it would be more efficient to let one process complete the
request (using maximum line throughput) and return some busy code to
other identical, simultaneous requests until the file is cached locally.
As anyone run into a similar situation? What solution did y
I am using a reverse proxy to cache a remote site. The files are mostly
rpms, with varying sizes: 3-30M or more.
Now if you have a number of requests for the same file which is not yet
cached locally, all of these requests will download the requested file
from the remote site. It will slow down
On Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> The key questions are what OS are you using, and do you have a driver
> for the card which supports the /dev/cryptonet interface? The BCM 5820
> card works fine in Linux if you have an appropriate driver, I don't know
> about other OSs, probably
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 12:13:14AM -0700, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:58:57 +0100, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Changing just the _DN variable format with a config directive sounds OK.
> > Adding new variables would be an alternative, but the names would
> > pr
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:58:57 +0100, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changing just the _DN variable format with a config directive sounds OK.
> Adding new variables would be an alternative, but the names would
> probably get *really* ugly...
>
That is correct - I should've been more clear in
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:46:20 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:17 PM 10/15/2004, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> > The current mod_ssl uses X509_NAME_oneline to get a one-line ASCII
> >format of the DN. This however, is not compliant with the RFC -
> >checkou
18 matches
Mail list logo