Stas Bekman wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 04:45:18PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
It looks like some poeple have a problem with LockFile directive
being compiled to a hardcoded value.
The problem:
[Tue Nov 02 17:16:22 2004] [emerg] (13)Permission denied: Couldn't
create accept
--On Friday, November 26, 2004 8:06 AM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Did you already mv them, nd?
Nope. Justin...? :-)
Done. =) -- justin
Hi,
I have a simple (but I think useful) program for measuring a trafic of each
VirtualHost.
What can I do to see my program on page like this:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/programs/other.html
Many thanks for the informations :o)
Regards
Tony
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:55:35PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
Yep. I just did that, and it worked as expected. I ended up with a
clean merge: the only files that needed merge conflict resolution were
those that had been modified in the srclib/pcre copy:
Looks good, thanks Brian. Do you
* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, November 26, 2004 8:06 AM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Did you already mv them, nd?
Nope. Justin...? :-)
Done. =) -- justin
Thx!
The update instruction is simple. cd to the checked out build directory and
svn switch
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:55:35PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
Yep. I just did that, and it worked as expected. I ended up with a
clean merge: the only files that needed merge conflict resolution were
those that had been modified in the srclib/pcre copy:
Looks good,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 04:00:46PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
I volunteer to upgrade the copy of PCRE in httpd-2.1 to the latest
version. I'll have a bit of time to work on this over the next few days.
Any chance of integrating the fix in bug 27550 at the same time?
While trying to get NetWare to build with the new PCRE update, I
noticed that there is a duplicate of pcreposix.h in both include/ and
srclib/pcre/ directories. Currently they don't match which is causing
the NetWare build to break. I can sync them up, but the real question
is should this
Checked in
thanks,
Brad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:12:06 PM
Greetings All,
Attached and listed below are two NWGNUmakefiles plus diff's to add
them
into to the httpd build processdisavow being a wiz at this stuff
and
if someone doesn't like the names chosen, etc
Brad Nicholes wrote:
While trying to get NetWare to build with the new PCRE update, I
noticed that there is a duplicate of pcreposix.h in both include/ and
srclib/pcre/ directories. Currently they don't match which is causing
the NetWare build to break. I can sync them up, but the real
Greetings,
The move of mod_cache to a home of its own also requires a tweak to the
NWGNUmakefile file it left behind; in .\eperimental\NWGNUmakefile:
TARGET_nlm = \
$(OBJDIR)/charsetl.nlm \
$(OBJDIR)/example.nlm \
- $(OBJDIR)/mod_cach.nlm \
- $(OBJDIR)/mem_cach.nlm \
Greetings All,
When using the June ndk, Apache2.1 builds without issue down to where
the new pcre is being inserted; however an update to the October NDK
LibC results in the following:
Compiling locks/netware/thread_mutex.c
### mwccnlm Compiler:
# File: locks\netware\thread_mutex.c
#
Richard Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 04:00:46PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
I volunteer to upgrade the copy of PCRE in httpd-2.1 to the latest
version. I'll have a bit of time to work on this over the next few days.
Any chance of integrating the fix in bug 27550 at the same time?
Has something recently changed with sub-request/internal redirects in 2.0?
I'm not sure if those are tested by httpd-test, but all modperl tests that
call these methods are now hanging. This happens only with worker. But
works just fine with prefork.
The same behavior with 2.1/worker.
--
I know those are debug level warnings, but are those really needed?
I get 34 of these identical lines every time the module is initialized:
[Sat Nov 27 15:37:42 2004] [debug] proxy_util.c(1444): proxy: initialized
worker 0 for (rabbit.stason.org:8529) min=0 max=2 smax=2
why so many identical
Greetings All,
Thanks to all the recent updates the 2.1 (.2?) now builds cleanly using
the June LibC from go to whoa
However the issue mentioned previously with the Oct LibC persists... the
LibC docs show no change in the function definition...
Regards,
Norm
It looks like some changes in the LibC SDK exposed some type
mismatches in some of the NetWare code. These have been fixed and
checked in.
Brad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Saturday, November 27, 2004 2:04:41 PM
Greetings All,
Thanks to all the recent updates the 2.1 (.2?) now builds cleanly using
hi.
I'm building from a clean slate (new box) and am having issues building it.
It seems not to be including the stuff in listen.c
its OS/X 10.3.6 with november's gcc patch.. no fink on it either.
/ex/build-1/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -faltivec -mcpu=7450
-mtune=7450 -mpowerpc
Ian Holsman wrote:
hi.
I'm building from a clean slate (new box) and am having issues
building it.
It seems not to be including the stuff in listen.c
its OS/X 10.3.6 with november's gcc patch.. no fink on it either.
I just did a build from a clean SVN checkout on 10.3.6, and it worked.
I was
I have recently developed a first-draft namespace module mod_sql for
incorporating SQL into HTML/XML pages with mod_publisher or mod_xmlns.
In doing so, I revisited the existing database connection pooling modules,
and reclassified them as drivers for mod_sql. I also added support for
Nick Kew wrote:
I have recently developed a first-draft namespace module mod_sql for
incorporating SQL into HTML/XML pages with mod_publisher or mod_xmlns.
In doing so, I revisited the existing database connection pooling modules,
and reclassified them as drivers for mod_sql. I also added support
Brian Pane wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
hi.
I'm building from a clean slate (new box) and am having issues
building it.
It seems not to be including the stuff in listen.c
its OS/X 10.3.6 with november's gcc patch.. no fink on it either.
I just did a build from a clean SVN checkout on 10.3.6, and
22 matches
Mail list logo
