William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
> Incident http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31443
> offers a solution which we should consider adopting. As I was
> asking for some offline feedback - Graham mentioned that some
> implementations use the URL to specify that STARTTLS is desired.
> But wi
On 05/01/2005, at 1:17 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 06:06 PM 1/4/2005, Andre Pang wrote:
[...]
This doesn't quite work however, because foo_handler is declared to be
of the ap_HOOK_handler_t type. Since the ap_HOOK_handler_t typedef is
declared in the Apache headers files without __cdecl, th
At 06:06 PM 1/4/2005, Andre Pang wrote:
>[...]
>This doesn't quite work however, because foo_handler is declared to be
>of the ap_HOOK_handler_t type. Since the ap_HOOK_handler_t typedef is
>declared in the Apache headers files without __cdecl, the compiler
>type-checks ap_HOOK_handler_t as
Hi all,
I've been writing some Apache 2.0 (HTTP Server) modules, and I've found
a problem with Windows calling conventions. Apache assumes that the
module is compiled with Windows' __cdecl calling convention. This is
OK. If an Apache module is compiled with a __stdcall calling
convention
Does anyone have any references to specifying STARTTLS as part
of the URI to the ldap server? Any other comments on this patch
before I integrate into httpd-2.1?
No, it should be specified by a configuration option, as suggested
in the PR.
Roy
At 01:55 PM 1/4/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:40 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>Incident http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31443
>>offers a solution which we should consider adopting. As I was
>>asking for some offline feedback - Graham mentioned that some
On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:40 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Incident http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31443
offers a solution which we should consider adopting. As I was
asking for some offline feedback - Graham mentioned that some
implementations use the URL to specify that STARTTLS
It seems that our support for ssl/tls with mod_ldap is considerably
confusing and frustrating for users. The recent interest in fixing
support for the Solaris/Netscape/Mozilla library reminded me of the
fact that we need to finish thinking this through.
Fast summary for those less familiar; there
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:45:13 -0800, Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Tuesday, January 4, 2005 8:48 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here is current patch-in-progress. I'd guess there many bugs. I
> > don't mean to waste anyone's time with an in-progress
--On Tuesday, January 4, 2005 8:48 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is current patch-in-progress. I'd guess there many bugs. I
don't mean to waste anyone's time with an in-progress mess, but any
comments on the current state would be very valuable.
How about creating a bran
On 4 Jan 2005 09:58:09 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: jfclere
> Date: Tue Jan 4 01:58:01 2005
> New Revision: 124080
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=124080
> Log:
> Add including of util_charset.h otherwise ap_hdrs_from_ascii is not defined.
>
>
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:28:54 -0500, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:31:36 -0800 (PST), Justin Erenkrantz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Turning on sendchunks by default is going to result in broken behavior on
> > all sorts of popular sites:
>
> I believe you, t
12 matches
Mail list logo
