Re: Mod_SSL in binaries

2005-03-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 08:20 PM 3/11/2005, Graham Leggett wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >Is it correct to say that right now in the Unix domain, we are allowed to >distribute a binary mod_ssl on condition it is dynamically linked to a crypto >library (SSL) not included in the distribution? In this case, the

Re: Mod_SSL in binaries

2005-03-11 Thread Graham Leggett
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Before you gripe at us (httpd) though, I suggest you ask why you can't get libeay32.dll/ssleay32.dll binaries from openssl.org? Providing users mod_ssl.so with no crypto is actually very easy after the BXA refined all the rules about 'hooks'. In fact, those rules were (

Re: Mod_SSL in binaries

2005-03-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
[blind CC'ed to our board] At 06:52 PM 3/11/2005, Jason Rigby wrote: >I guess for now I will have to continue compiling the ssl enabled >version of apache from the source... I commented on this on the 25th of Feb, both with respect to releasing mod_ssl binaries (plus the ever critical ssleay32.

Mod_SSL in binaries

2005-03-11 Thread Jason Rigby
Hi all, I'm just curious as to the reasons that Mod_SSL is not included in pre-compiled versions of Apache. I presume they're legal issues as I recall a while ago that Microsoft, due to export restrictions, could not release their High Encryption Pack for Internet Explorer however they did over com

Re: [PATCH] remove str* overrides

2005-03-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
+1 to commit in both httpd-2.1 and backport to 2.0. This code was simply wrong, we had no business overriding the clib headers. At 03:44 PM 3/11/2005, Joe Schaefer wrote: >Any reason these str* overrides are still in httpd.h? >Here's a patch to remove them from trunk, tested with >both --enable

[PATCH] remove str* overrides

2005-03-11 Thread Joe Schaefer
Any reason these str* overrides are still in httpd.h? Here's a patch to remove them from trunk, tested with both --enable-maintainer-mode and --enable-pool-debug set. Index: include/httpd.h === --- include/httpd.h (revision 157131

HTTP 1.1 Pipling Requests

2005-03-11 Thread Alexander Lazic
Hi, i have read the rfc 2616 and have a understanding question to you, if you can help me ;-)) --- 8.1.2.2 Pipelining A client that supports persistent connections MAY "pipeline" its requests (i.e., send multiple requests without waiting for each response). A server MUST send its responses to

Re: Posix mutex in apache modue

2005-03-11 Thread Paul Querna
P. Asokan wrote: Hi All, First I sould not ask this question here. But many of you might have come across this situation here. I have some common files which are being used in our Apache module and also some other projects. To make my module as Apache MPM worker compliant, I have to make it threa

Posix mutex in apache modue

2005-03-11 Thread P. Asokan
Hi All, First I sould not ask this question here. But many of you might have come across this situation here. I have some common files which are being used in our Apache module and also some other projects. To make my module as Apache MPM worker compliant, I have to make it thread safe. Can I

Re: ApacheCon 2005 US

2005-03-11 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 07:25:38AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Friday, March 11, 2005 9:33 AM + Colm MacCarthaigh > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Does anyone know what the story is with the website? I've been trying > >to submit a presentation, but the website is down, and I've n

Re: ApacheCon 2005 US

2005-03-11 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Friday, March 11, 2005 9:33 AM + Colm MacCarthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone know what the story is with the website? I've been trying to submit a presentation, but the website is down, and I've not gotten a response from info@ , though admitadly I only tried this last night

Re: how to avoid overrun in apache

2005-03-11 Thread Nitesh Naik
The problem is when apache reinitializes modules for the second time to make sure that it will come up after graceful. Don't know what this process is called. - Original Message - From: "Andy Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 7:21 PM Subject: Re: how to av

Re: how to avoid overrun in apache

2005-03-11 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 11 Mar 2005, at 05:27, Nitesh Naik wrote: Purify instrumented /servers/run/apache/bin/httpd (pid 8850) UMR: Uninitialized memory read: * This is occurring while in thread 1074225280: SHA1_Update[libcrypto.a] * Reading 1 byte from 0x8f7293f in the heap. * Address 0x

Re: how to avoid overrun in apache

2005-03-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:18:56 +0530, Nitesh Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well I tried without SSL and other modules but still no luck. > > Purify output. > > * Command-line: ./httpd > > Purify instrumented ./httpd (pid 32106) > COR: Fatal core dump: > * This is occurring whi

Re: how to avoid overrun in apache

2005-03-11 Thread Nitesh Naik
Hi Jeff, Well I tried without SSL and other modules but still no luck. Purify output. * Command-line: ./httpd Purify instrumented ./httpd (pid 32106) COR: Fatal core dump: * This is occurring while in thread 1074224000: _p2154static [rtlib.o] detach [ht

Re: piped log bug?

2005-03-11 Thread Arkadi Shishlov
I pluged signal(SIGTERM, SIG_IGN) into cronolog and that solved the problem for me. arkadi.

Re: ApacheCon 2005 US

2005-03-11 Thread Mladen Turk
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: However, ApacheCon Europe 2005 will be held in Stuttgart, Germany, 18-22 July. Does anyone know what the story is with the website? I've been trying to submit a presentation, but the website is down, and I've not gotten a response from info@ , though admitadly I only tried

Re: ApacheCon 2005 US

2005-03-11 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > According to Brian: > > > When/where is ApacheCon 2005 US? > > We have no final decision on this yet. > > However, ApacheCon Europe 2005 will be held in Stuttgart, Germany, > 18-22 July. Does anyone know what the story is with t