A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-RC2.tar.gz
Please take the time to exercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
This candidate
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-RC2.tar.gz
Please take the time to exercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or
flood STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004-11-24 19:36:41 -0500 (Wed, 24 Nov 2004) $]
Release:
1.0: Released July 23, 2002
milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002
ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004-11-24 19:36:41 -0500 (Wed, 24 Nov 2004) $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-RC2.tar.gz
Please take the time to exercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Herve Guillemet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can't locate object method FIRSTKEY via package
APR::Request::Param::Table
when I try something like :
my $req = APR::Request::Apache2-handle($r);
my $table = $req-param;
my $fk = each %$table;
While using
Listed in the TODO section of STATUS is this:
- Implement (some of) RFC 2047 in the multipart parser.
e.g.
Content-Disposition: name=foo filename==?iso-8859-1?q?foo.txt?=
Should we try and decode filename to foo.txt, or leave it encoded?
I think we need to settle this issue before doing a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: joes
Date: Wed Oct 12 15:29:53 2005
New Revision: 315063
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=315063view=rev
Log:
Fetch the --with-apache2-apxs argument from
Apache2::BuildConfig if none is given on the
command line. This should allow the CPAN
install to be
On 10/12/2005 12:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
[..cut..]
BTW: I just noticed that
c = strchr(url, ':');
if (c == NULL || c[1] != '/' || c[2] != '/' || c[3] == '\0')
return NULL;
in ap_proxy_get_worker of proxy_util.c seem to be unneeded now
(Only came to
William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
So... is it unreasonable in README.RPM to point the user to obtain the
current httpd.spec/httpd.in from /dist/httpd/httpd-2.0.55-rpm-src.tar.gz
which would be grabbed from svn httpd/package/rpm/, and drop it into the
unpacked httpd-2.0.55 source tarball, in order to
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 04:31, Paul Querna wrote:
An outline of what needs to be done can be found here:
http://intertwingly.net/stories/2005/09/28/xchar.rb
Erm, no. We need to reencode from any incoming charset.
We don't need to reinvent any wheels by recreating individual
On 10/12/2005 12:09 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:43:35PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
URL:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10/12/2005 12:09 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:43:35PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
URL:
On Oct 11, 2005, at 11:48 PM, Glenn Strauss wrote:
May I humbly request inclusion of a patch I wrote almost a year ago?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31858
|31858|New|Maj|2004-10-22|regular expression matching broken on amd64
It is not a feature request; it fixes a
Andy Armstrong wrote:
I'm prepared to do some work on such a module but I don't want to do
it if there's some obvious alternative I'm missing. Is this something
that might be useful? Is there something out there already that I've
missed?
This may not be the most appropriate place to discuss
On 12 Oct 2005, at 14:54, Brian Akins wrote:
I'm prepared to do some work on such a module but I don't want to
do it if there's some obvious alternative I'm missing. Is this
something that might be useful? Is there something out there
already that I've missed?
This may not be the most
The httpd-2.0.55 RC currently running on ajax had a segfault about an
hour ago, here's the backtrace.
Looks like a crash in mod_mobx, so I don't think it affects the httpd
release.
#0 0x209f30a0 in strlen () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6.1
#1 0x210109f0 in
Given 2.1's current beta status, what rules govern breaking the ABI
right now? Is it yes, but then MMN must change too?
I'm thinking specifically of replacing functions that have become mere
stubs for another func since 2.0 with macros. For a specific case-in-point,
see Line 352 of
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:20:40AM -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
The httpd-2.0.55 RC currently running on ajax had a segfault about an
hour ago, here's the backtrace.
Looks like a crash in mod_mobx, so I don't think it affects the httpd
release.
Paul, Sam, and I analyzed the cores and
Nick Kew wrote:
Given 2.1's current beta status, what rules govern breaking the ABI
right now?
Break it. 2.odd has no ABI/API rules. 2.even is constrained, so since
we will be stuck with the ABI for a year or two, while 2.2 is supported,
better to be stuck with the best API we could come up
On Oct 12, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:20:40AM -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
The httpd-2.0.55 RC currently running on ajax had a segfault about an
hour ago, here's the backtrace.
Looks like a crash in mod_mobx, so I don't think it affects the httpd
On 10/12/2005 01:38 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
[..cut..]
Yup, if using strchr on a const variable, the correct method to preserve
const-ness and avoid those warnings is:
const char *foo;
foo = ap_strchr_c(some_const_char_string, 'x');
note that 'c' would need to be const above
André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Joe Schaefer wrote:
Listed in the TODO section of STATUS is this:
- Implement (some of) RFC 2047 in the multipart parser.
e.g.
Content-Disposition: name=foo filename==?iso-8859-1?q?foo.txt?=
Should we try and decode filename to foo.txt, or
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:31:42PM -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
There is now:
[Wed Oct 12 22:04:43 2005] [notice] child pid 5885 exit signal =20
Segmentation fault (11), possible coredump in /raid1/httpd-cores
Backtrace:
...
Note, this was /raid1/httpd-cores/core.5885 .
(gdb) print
Hi!
We have Apache/Subversion server under Windows Server 2003. And I was
come into problem with restarting server that process long request
(more than 180 seconds). It's usual for bug Subversion repository. I
see messages like this in error.log:
[Thu Oct 13 02:28:01 2005] [notice] Child 3952:
Ivan Zhakov wrote:
Hi!We have Apache/Subversion server under Windows Server 2003. And I wascome
into problem with restarting server that process long request(more than 180
seconds). It's usual for bug Subversion repository. Isee messages like this in
error.log:[Thu Oct 13 02:28:01 2005]
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Listed in the TODO section of STATUS is this:
- Implement (some of) RFC 2047 in the multipart parser.
e.g.
Content-Disposition: name=foo filename==?iso-8859-1?q?foo.txt?=
2. Syntax of encoded-words
An 'encoded-word' is defined by the following ABNF grammar. The
Kai Engels wrote:
Hi Bill
Patch 2: Call to arm_destory_application
This is it. Just a call to arm destroy application() as the standard
awaits it
Greetings
Kai
Committed.
Bill
28 matches
Mail list logo
