DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33880] - Only URIs that map to files can be Executed

2005-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33880. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[jira] Created: (MODPYTHON-91) Improve error message when quit run in pdb debugger.

2005-11-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton (JIRA)
Improve error message when quit run in pdb debugger. -- Key: MODPYTHON-91 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-91 Project: mod_python Type: Improvement Components: core Versions: 3.3

Re: Perl framework patch for Apache bug 37145

2005-11-10 Thread Zubin Kika
Hi, Thank you Joe for your suggestions. I have incorporated the changes and attached two files: 1)pr37145.t: This file is to be placed in t/ssl/ 2)testrev_proxy.pl: This file is to be placed in t/htdocs/modules/cgi/ Please review. With regards, Zubin --- Joe Orton [EMAIL

Building Apache 2.0.55

2005-11-10 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi All, I'm trying to get Apache2 2.0.55 building and running on OS/2 using GCC 3.3.5. There's a current build of Apache using GCC 2.8.1 but that GCC is getting a bit long in the tooth so I'd like to update things :) Anyway, I have it building ok - using the unix network_io and poll code

Re: Perl framework patch for Apache bug 37145

2005-11-10 Thread Zubin Kika
Don't know why the other file didn't make it. Attaching pr37145.t again. Zubin --- Zubin Kika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Thank you Joe for your suggestions. I have incorporated the changes and attached two files: 1)pr37145.t: This file is to be placed in t/ssl/

Re: Building Apache 2.0.55

2005-11-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 11/10/05, Paul Smedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to get Apache2 2.0.55 building and running on OS/2 using GCC 3.3.5. There's a current build of Apache using GCC 2.8.1 but that GCC is getting a bit long in the tooth so I'd like to update things :) Anyway, I have it

Re: Head's Up: tab - space cleanup

2005-11-10 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 08:27:49AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: Just a FYI that I'll be performing a TAB-8-SPACE cleanup on all the .c files in both httpd-trunk and httpd-2.2. We've gotten sloppy as far as that's concerned and we might as well bite the bullet and do the fixes now :) While we

Re: Head's Up: tab - space cleanup

2005-11-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 10, 2005, at 8:56 AM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 08:27:49AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: Just a FYI that I'll be performing a TAB-8-SPACE cleanup on all the .c files in both httpd-trunk and httpd-2.2. We've gotten sloppy as far as that's concerned and we might as

Re: Head's Up: tab - space cleanup

2005-11-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim Jagielski wrote: Just a FYI that I'll be performing a TAB-8-SPACE cleanup on all the .c files in both httpd-trunk and httpd-2.2. We've gotten sloppy as far as that's concerned and we might as well bite the bullet and do the fixes now :) I noticed you touched the .c's - but wouldn't the

Re: Head's Up: tab - space cleanup

2005-11-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Just a FYI that I'll be performing a TAB-8-SPACE cleanup on all the .c files in both httpd-trunk and httpd-2.2. We've gotten sloppy as far as that's concerned and we might as well bite the bullet and do the fixes now :) I noticed you

More code cleanups...

2005-11-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
In the Netware, OS2 and Win sections, there is prevalent use of '//' commenting... Should we convert them to real C comment style?

Re: file tree diff of 2.0 vs 2.2

2005-11-10 Thread Joshua Slive
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Adding comments or better docs is always a good thing. One thing is that these modules are *much* simpler than their 2.0 counterparts, so the need for extensive documentation isn't as pressing - provided you understand how they all fit together. =) -- justin

Re: [jira] Created: (MODPYTHON-87) psp_parser: replaces \n on \n

2005-11-10 Thread Jim Gallacher
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: This just get's stranger and stranger. Regenerating psp_parser.c from the current psp_parser.l has caused my psp pages to go completely pair-shaped. Things that rendered correctly before now puke up hairballs. For

Re: More code cleanups...

2005-11-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim Jagielski wrote: In the Netware, OS2 and Win sections, there is prevalent use of '//' commenting... Should we convert them to real C comment style? Certainly we can - as all three have the potential to be built with gcc toolchains rather than their native compilers. Right now I think all

Re: Authentication madness (a.k.a. suggestions?) regarding auth_basic and authn_alias

2005-11-10 Thread Andreas Lindström
On 11/2/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Lindström wrote: Here comes some suggestions for further development of mod_authn_alias and also some suggestions for mod_ldap and mod_authnz_ldap: [...] For example, these three configuration options (there are

Re: NWGNUmakefile update for APR1.2?

2005-11-10 Thread NormW
Greetings All, (Blush) Seems the missing symbol is lost from aprlib.imp; a check of APR 1.2 shows the function is declared in apr_support.h as: apr_status_t apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout(apr_file_t *f, apr_socket_t *s, int for_read); Shouldn't that be

Re: file tree diff of 2.0 vs 2.2

2005-11-10 Thread Brad Nicholes
I can tell that my session on New Modular Authentication Architecture in Apache 2.2 should be a real hit (http://apachecon.com/2005/US/html/sessions.html/e=MjAwNS9VUw#1479) at ApacheCon. :) My entire presentation talks about how it all fits together and how to move from 2.0 to 2.2. /me

Re: file tree diff of 2.0 vs 2.2

2005-11-10 Thread Brad Nicholes
On 11/9/2005 at 8:25:13 pm, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: o We have 84 NWGNU* makefiles in the tree, which I find quite wasteful. Why aren't they generated by a Netware script? At the very least, they should have a comment on the top that

Re: More code cleanups...

2005-11-10 Thread Brad Nicholes
I don't anticipate the NetWare code ever being built with GCC, but who knows what could happen. It's mainly an NLM linker issue. I am fine with converting // commenting to standard C comment style. At the very least, we maintain style consistency. Brad On 11/10/2005 at 10:32:10 am, in

Re: svn commit: r227435 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUS modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2005-11-10 Thread André Malo
Nobody? * André Malo wrote: Anyone? * Andr__ Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jim Date: Thu Aug 4 10:07:57 2005 New Revision: 227435 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=227435view=rev Log: mod_proxy: Fix over-eager handling of '%' for