Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Jan 25 23:50:06 2006

2006-01-26 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/26/2006 05:50 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- > Last modified at [$Date: 2005-12-16 16:06:45 -0500 (Fri, 16 Dec 2005) $] > It would be nice to have the STATUS file from 2.2.x also sent to docs@ and dev@ Regard

Re: Change in how to configure authorization

2006-01-26 Thread Joshua Slive
I haven't done any of this work myself, but... On 1/26/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > It looks like recently some people have changed how authorization is > working on the trunk. > > Could those people please > > 1. add a note to docs/upgrading.html to document what us idiots

Re: svn commit: r372037 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUSserver/core.c

2006-01-26 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 1/24/2006 at 3:45:47 pm, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: colm > Date: Tue Jan 24 14:45:43 2006 > New Revision: 372037 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372037&view=rev > Log: > Backport the NET_TIME elimination fix. > > Submitted by: wrowe > >

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Jan 25 23:50:06 2006

2006-01-26 Thread Joost de Heer
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2005-12-16 16:06:45 -0500 (Fri, 16 Dec 2005) $] It would be nice to have the STATUS file from 2.2.x also sent to docs@ and dev@ ... and to have the subject of this status mail changed to [STATU

Re: svn commit: r372037 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUSserver/core.c

2006-01-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Brad Nicholes wrote: This patch breaks the NetWare build with an "Illegal implicit conversion" trying to pass a 'struct conn_rec *' to ap_log_error() rather than a 'struct server_rec *'. Seems a little dangerous to be passing a pointer to a completely different structure. Either the calls to

Re: svn commit: r372037 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUSserver/core.c

2006-01-26 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 1/26/2006 at 11:02:14 am, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/24/2006 at 3:45:47 pm, in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> Author: colm >> Date: Tue Jan 24 14:45:43 2006 >> New Revision: 372037 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcv

Re: svn commit: r372037 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUSserver/core.c

2006-01-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Brad Nicholes wrote: Applying the following patch should fix it. Index: core.c === --- core.c (revision 372564) +++ core.c (working copy) @@ -4525,7 +4525,7 @@ rv = apr_socket_timeout_set(csd, c->base_server->timeout)

Re: svn commit: r372037 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUSserver/core.c

2006-01-26 Thread Paul Querna
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Brad Nicholes wrote: Applying the following patch should fix it. Index: core.c === --- core.c(revision 372564) +++ core.c(working copy) @@ -4525,7 +4525,7 @@ rv = apr_socket_timeout_set(csd,

Re: svn commit: r372037 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUSserver/core.c

2006-01-26 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 12:15:16PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >-ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, rv, c, > >+ap_log_cerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, rv, c, > > "apr_socket_timeout_set"); > > } > > For expediency's sake, +1 +1 here also. -- C

Re: Change in how to configure authorization

2006-01-26 Thread Ian Holsman
Hi Joshua: httpd.conf.in has the new structure httpd-std.conf (the one I was looking at) didn't ;( regards

Re: Time for 2.0.56 ?

2006-01-26 Thread Brandon Fosdick
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: I've been extremely busy for the last month, and it doesn't look like I'll have much time for coding in the next few weeks. If anyone wants to work on execd stuff fire away, most of what I have uncommitted is a mash of things I have to clean up. In December, Joe Orton

Re: Time for 2.0.56 ?

2006-01-26 Thread Masanari Iida
Hello, Will you include following patch into 2.0 series? http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=370692&view=rev It was discussed in http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38070 Thanks Masanari