On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
so, you want something like this eventually
Listen 0.0.0.0:8530 nntp
AcceptFilter nntp none
VirtualHost _default_:8530
I think it may be time to re-think the logic of this configuration
snippet in the perl-framework, since the
Hi All,
Hoping someone might have some ideas on the following
I've built the latest Apache2 (currently 2.2.2) PHP5 (currently
5.1.2) for OS/2 and they're largely running well - with one gotcha.
If modphp5.dll is the ONLY module loaded in httpd.conf, it works
perfectly.
If ANY other
Hi all!
I'm currently working on beating mod_disk_cache into submission, with
the goal of it being able to deliver data while caching a file (this
started as bug #39380). I have solved most of the problems, I'll
submit patches when they have passed the scrutiny of my fellow
computer club
Hello,
I am a student from Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research (SICSR), Pune, India doing my
post graduation in Computer Applications.
I am a C programming fan and love Open Source Software. I was in charge of designing the website
for the prestigious event GNUnify'2006
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:35:23PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Please test and vote on releasing httpd 2.2.2, bundling APR and APR-Util
1.2.7.
Belatedly +1, testall passes for:
PASS: RHEL4/ppc64 RHEL3/i686 RHEL4/i686 FC5/i686 FC4/i686 RHEL3/ppc64
FC3/i686 RHEL3/x86_64 FC5/x86_64
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
The naive solution is to spawn a child that does the copying letting the
request be processed simultaneously. Is this doable?
possibly...
Would it be considered offensive to do apr_thread_create() if threads
are available and fork() otherwise?
sounds reasonable -
As most things are now in hooks, why not make virtual host selection a
hook as well? I have a few really strange setups that would be alot
easier to configure if I could override how the virtual host is selected.
Thoughts?
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
Every time I write something, I always seem to forget something else...
Four extra points that I have to make:
1) By default VC8 doesn't allow you to mix managed and unmanaged types
in a CLR class. I suppressed C4368 to get around this; it doesn't
seem to create any problems.
2) As
The components:
mod_http_cache: what mod_cache is currently
mod_cache: a generic caching module - provides glue between providers
and other modules. Think mod_dbd...
cache providers: disk, mem, memcache, mysql, etc.
An example mod_http_cache:
-generate cache key
-ask mod_cache for object
This type of request is becoming more and more common.
Although mod_mbox obscures the basic to and from address, there are
still two problems:
1. It doesn't obscure email addresses in the body of the message
(which could be from forwarded/quoted messages).
2. The raw link still gives access to
Brian Akins wrote:
mod_cache: a generic caching module - provides glue between providers
The more I think about it, this part doesn't even need to be httpd
specific. It could be apr_cache. Not sure how that would scre things
up. I also noticed that the whole providers thing is httpd and
Brian Akins wrote:
The components:
mod_http_cache: what mod_cache is currently
One thing about the current implementation. Mod_cache does server side
caching, but also set expires headers witch trigger client (browser)
caching. Right now you can't turn off setting the expires header with
Bart van der Schans wrote:
One thing about the current implementation. Mod_cache does server side
caching, but also set expires headers witch trigger client (browser)
caching. Right now you can't turn off setting the expires header with
mod_cache. I think it would be nice to have an option to
On Thursday 27 April 2006 14:51, Brian Akins wrote:
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
The naive solution is to spawn a child that does the copying letting the
request be processed simultaneously. Is this doable?
possibly...
Might be worth looking at how the various CGI implementations work.
Or
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:04, Brian Akins wrote:
The components:
How would this fit with the various half-HTTP cacheing standards
floating around, and the SoC projects that have been mooted?
It seems to me that cache is ripe for generalisation.
mod_http_cache: what mod_cache is currently
Brian Akins wrote:
Some functions a provider should provide:
init(args...) - initialize an instance :)
open(instance, key) - open a cache object
read_buffer(object, buffer, copy) - read entire object into buffer.
buffer may be read only (ie, it may be mmapped or part of sql statement)
or
Brian Akins wrote:
The components:
mod_http_cache: what mod_cache is currently
mod_cache: a generic caching module - provides glue between providers
and other modules. Think mod_dbd...
cache providers: disk, mem, memcache, mysql, etc.
This sounds like a refactoring job, which is a good
This sounds like a good idea.
are you thinking of it being a config-time hook or a additional hook
in the request-processing stage?
I can see cases where you might want both.
regards
Ian
On 27/04/2006, at 11:54 PM, Brian Akins wrote:
As most things are now in hooks, why not make virtual
LibXML2 is released under the MIT license. From what I understand, some
parts of Apache2 are subject to the same license, so a project released
that's linking against LibXML2 would still fall under the terms of the
Apache License 2.x.
Does that seem right? If I'm releasing an apache2 module under
19 matches
Mail list logo
