Re: mod_proxy_xxxxx last resort fallback redirect ?

2006-06-17 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 06/17/2006 05:56 PM, Darryl Miles wrote: > Internal being a fall through to the configured mapping and content > handler for the URL just as-if the ProxyPass directive wasn't there, I > was thinking along the lines of this being configured with a > "fallthrough:" scheme prefix. This means it

Re: debug apache

2006-06-17 Thread Alexander Lazic
On Sam 17.06.2006 13:14, Nick Kew wrote: On Saturday 17 June 2006 09:47, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote: > On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not >> possible out of the box. >> It may be

Re: mod_proxy_xxxxx last resort fallback redirect ?

2006-06-17 Thread Joost de Heer
DocumentRoot /opt/apache/htdocs ProxyPass / balancer://group1/ timeout=5 maxattempts=3 fallback-redirect=fallthrough:/holding.html Would this work? RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !-U RewriteRule /.* http://fallback.server/notworking.html Joost

Re: mod_proxy_xxxxx last resort fallback redirect ?

2006-06-17 Thread Nick Kew
On Saturday 17 June 2006 16:56, Darryl Miles wrote: > Request for comments, Starting from ErrorDocument, what would you envisage needs changing to meet your aspirations? -- Nick Kew

mod_proxy_xxxxx last resort fallback redirect ?

2006-06-17 Thread Darryl Miles
I'm interested in your comments (good and bad) on implementing a new option to ProxyPass which would make apache perform a redirect when the proxy server or balancer cluster is not available. This minics the same functionality of a dedicated hardware load balancer by issuing a HTTP redirect

Re: Question about NameVirtualHost

2006-06-17 Thread Joost de Heer
Paul Querna wrote: Joost de Heer wrote: Hello, Should a check be added to add_name_vhost_config() to see if it's a duplicate NameVirtualHost? At the moment, you can have multiple 'NameVirtualHost *:80', which will result in an odd message 'NameVirtualHost *:80 has no virtualhosts'. I think

Re: Question about NameVirtualHost

2006-06-17 Thread Paul Querna
Joost de Heer wrote: Hello, Should a check be added to add_name_vhost_config() to see if it's a duplicate NameVirtualHost? At the moment, you can have multiple 'NameVirtualHost *:80', which will result in an odd message 'NameVirtualHost *:80 has no virtualhosts'. I think its reasonable to c

Re: debug apache

2006-06-17 Thread Nick Kew
On Saturday 17 June 2006 09:47, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote: > > On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not possible > >> out of the box. > >> It may be possible if you modify the hook ma

Re: debug apache

2006-06-17 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote: > On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not possible >> out of the box. >> It may be possible if you modify the hook macros. > > > And do you think that the developer would a

Question about NameVirtualHost

2006-06-17 Thread Joost de Heer
Hello, Should a check be added to add_name_vhost_config() to see if it's a duplicate NameVirtualHost? At the moment, you can have multiple 'NameVirtualHost *:80', which will result in an odd message 'NameVirtualHost *:80 has no virtualhosts'. Joost