Hi,
Looks like all three will need an -RC2. There's still a few things to fix
before I roll them though.
If you have free tuits, please jump in.
Apache-Test 1.29-rc1
Linux 2.6.15 perl 5.6/httpd 2.0.59/mod_perl 2.03rc1
PASS
Win32 using perl-5.8.8 and apach
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
However, I don't see how you can do a lockless design with multiple
files and an index that can do:
* Clients read from the cache as files are being cached.
* Only one session caches the same file.
* Header/Body updates.
* No index/files out-of-sync issues. Ever.
It'
Joachim Zobel wrote:
> Is there anybody?
I was tempted to put some Pink Floyd lyrics as a response, but I don't
think that would be in the correct spirit of thingsI guess we've not
got much to say :-( or is that a good thing...
Enough spam from me. Sorry...
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
However, I don't see how you can do a lockless design with multiple
files and an index that can do:
* Clients read from the cache as files are being cached.
* Only one session caches the same file.
* Header/Body updates.
* No index/files out-of-sync issues. Ever.
Thi
Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:51:43PM +0200, Joachim Zobel wrote:
>> Is there anybody?
>>
> Yes.
Traffic on the old list apache-modules was always bursty, 20 post days,
all the to the other end of the spectrum with 20 day silences :)
Nothing to panic about.
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Howdy all, is a module written under v2.0.54 supposed to be
able to work with apache 2.2 without being recompiled ?
Apologies if this is a rtfm question.
--markc
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> mod_perl 2.0.3-rc1
NetBSD 3.0 i386 perl 5.8.8 w/o ithreads httpd 2.2.3 -1 pgollucci
t/apr-ext fail because of bad LD_LIBRARY_PATH / DynaLoader foo.
I believe people have brought this failure up before and even suggested a patch
for it.
Anyone want to point to these
