On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Hi Roy,
+1 approve requesting a mod_python TLP
+2 to the alterative: approve requesting a python TLP
I think that would be fine, except you will have to come up with a
name that is not Apache Python Project. That is essentially a
trademark
Thanks to all of those who responded to my whitescreen/segfault problems.
It turns out I was 'allocing' memory for the newly created dir_cfg and for
an array of rbl_handler pointers, but not for each individual rbl_pointer
structure that the rbl_handler pointers pointed to.
Now that that's
I think I was able to answer my own question(s).
This link got me curious:
http://www.f-m-c.org/projects/apache/html/3_3Extending_Apache.html
I read what seemed to say that the merging of directories was done at the
beginning of the handling of a request. I re-worked my debug code to output
to
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:38:08 -0800
Greg Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
Sorry about the two entries on the same list. For some reason this is the
first response that make it to my e-mail box. I can now see your answers
from the web. Thank you for your feedback and comments.
The answer to
Gregory Nicholls wrote:
I've been looking at mod-ftpd and mod-pop3 with a view to writing a
protocol module. What I haven't been able to work out from reading
these, is how a particular protocol module 'registers' its interest in
specific connections.
eg. Assume there's 2 protocols being
Devender Reddy wrote:
Hi,
I am writing an apache module in C and I am facing some problem while
retreiveing the POST elements data.
[snip]
Now I have to write one apache module in C, such that, I can get the
data of name, upload file name and the hidden variable.
Are you sure you need a
tor 2007-02-08 klockan 17:15 -0800 skrev Devi Krishna:
Hi,
Resending this mail, just in case anyone would have
suggestions/inputs as how to fix this for connections that are in the
ESTABLISHED state or FIN state or any other TCP state other than
LISTEN
Maybe change the wake up call to
Hi Roy,
+1 approve requesting a mod_python TLP
+2 to the alterative: approve requesting a python TLP
This is an idea that we've been knocking around for a while now, so I
think your timing is good.
Would it be possible to expand the proposal a little, whereby we would
become a TLP for
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Henrik Nordstrom
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Februar 2007 16:33
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Regarding graceful restart
tor 2007-02-08 klockan 17:15 -0800 skrev Devi Krishna:
Hi,
Resending this mail, just in case anyone would have
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Summary of mod_ftp graduation voting:
+1 on graduation (acceptance of code to httpd):
Don't forget Nick in the final tally :)
I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
process.
Ping?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
process.
Ping?
I mostly bring this up because the reports are due in about three days,
and it would be worthwhile to post the
fre 2007-02-09 klockan 18:34 +0100 skrev Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO:
Not if BSD accept filters are in place. In this case the kernel waits until it
sees a HTTP request until it wakes up the process.
And on Linux with TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT enabled you need to sent a least one byte
of data.
So send
On 2/9/07, Jim Gallacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to expand the proposal a little, whereby we would
become a TLP for python modules for httpd, rather than just mod_python
as a TLP?
Certainly!
At any rate, I'd be very happy to server on the new PMC, and if there a
lack of
Hi Folks, Thanks for the replies.
What seems to be happening in my case , is when I send a graceful restart to
apache, I get the following messages in the access log
127.0.0.1 [05/Feb/2007:13:35:25 +] GET / HTTP/1.0 400 284
127.0.0.1 [05/Feb/2007:13:35:25 +] GET / HTTP/1.0 400 284
14 matches
Mail list logo
