Clark Rawlins wrote ..
Hello,
I have a client I need to handle post requests for that uses
Content-Encoding: xml and Transfer-Encoding: chunked.
Now the Content-Encoding is no problem I plan on using sax to parse the
content. The chunked transfer encoding is where I have run into issues.
SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU
SUBMITTED BY: Roy T. Fielding
SUBMITTED FOR:The Apache Software Foundation
POINT OF CONTACT: Secretary, The Apache Software Foundation
FAX: +1-410-803-2258
MANUFACTURER(S): The Apache Software Foundation
PRODUCT NAME/MODEL
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:13:13 +0800
howard chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Any good resources for writing module (C, not Perl) for Apache2?
Follow my .sig.
--
Nick Kew
Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/
Module Gurus,
My module does (among many other things) HTTP POSTs to another webserver. I
was just told that I will have to be able to read (and deal with) data in
the response of a POST. I believe I will only need to regurgitate the
results of the response (without the headers) into the
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 15:14 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote:
I'm working on a protocol module for Apache 2.2 and ran into the lack of
UDP support in httpd. I'd like to try and remedy the situation in a
manner best suited for merging to trunk + backporting where possible. I
know that people have
How about something alone these lines? It assumes there is nobody with
LDAP_DEFAULT_LIMIT undefined AND LDAP_NO_LIMIT defined, but still supports
and wishes to use the -1 value.
--- util_ldap.c.defaultlimitWed Feb 21 16:08:51 2007
+++ util_ldap.c.nolimit Thu Feb 15 12:50:09 2007
@@ -52,15
On 2/22/2007 at 7:12 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about something alone these lines? It assumes there is nobody with
LDAP_DEFAULT_LIMIT undefined AND LDAP_NO_LIMIT defined, but still supports
and wishes to use the -1 value.
---
Howard,
Here's my $0.02 worth of links to resources:
http://www.apachetutor.org/dev/ (Nick's site ... and the book comes out
soon [if not already available])
http://modules.apache.org/doc/Intro_API_Prog.html
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/API.html
Am Donnerstag, den 22.02.2007, 01:56 -0800 schrieb Erica Zhang:
requests to Apache HTTP Server (or other kinds of server. I do not want
this module or middleware to be limited special platform.). Then the web
Then this is not the right place to ask (beyond general http advice).
Apache
Its the z/OS, has LDAP_NO_SIZELIMIT defined. Does not have nor support
LDAP_DEFAULT_SIZELIMIT
On 2/22/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/2007 at 7:12 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], David
Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about something alone these lines? It assumes there
SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU
SUBMITTED BY: Roy T. Fielding
SUBMITTED FOR:The Apache Software Foundation
POINT OF CONTACT: Secretary, The Apache Software Foundation
FAX: +1-410-803-2258
MANUFACTURER(S): The Apache Software Foundation
PRODUCT NAME/MODEL
On Feb 17, 2007, at 4:06 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
With the posting of these notifications, and record of the
http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ - there are no further
obstacles to posting http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/
apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
NOTIFICATION: http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
Something I notice about this page; does it make sense to explode the
visible hyperlink under Controlled Source to include the text of the
URI, e.g. ASF becomes ASF
On Feb 18, 2007, at 3:54 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
And is it now possible to post mod_ssl RPM binaries?
Yes. In fact, there is no reason to distinguish between 2.x binaries
containing and not containing mod_ssl -- they are all equally 5D002
export-controlled. We would have to fork the
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 17, 2007, at 4:06 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
All US legal obligations are satisfied. Correct?
Correct.
Thanks for confirmation. Rather than 'push this out' - I've started a
dialog (at least, I hope it becomes more than typing into the bitbucket)
about
On Feb 22, 2007, at 3:03 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
NOTIFICATION: http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
Something I notice about this page; does it make sense to explode the
visible hyperlink under Controlled Source to include the text of the
URI, e.g.
On Feb 22, 2007, at 3:06 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
No release, no binaries, Yes. What is your objection to binaries once
a new release is voted on (other than not releasable because ...)?
I'd rather not supply floods to the clueless. Providing tools to
developers is okay. If someone
17 matches
Mail list logo
