On Aug 30, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Please check out the updated mime.types file and, if possible, see
if it breaks anything on a real site.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/
mime.types
Technically, it is docs, but I am blurry-
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 06:24:55PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> >The patch replaces the memcmp by a strcmp to check for the trailing
> >NIL character, too.
>
> For mod_jk the problem you found here is the same. Thanks for finding it!
>
> We finally applied a slightly different patch, by keeping th
From the 2.2.x STATUS doc:
* mod_authn_dbd: Export any additional columns queried in the SQL select
into the environment with the name AUTHENTICATE_. This brings
mod_authn_dbd behaviour in line with mod_authnz_ldap.
Trunk: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=466865
On Fri, August 31, 2007 12:41 pm, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> From the 2.2.x STATUS doc:
>* mod_authn_dbd: Export any additional columns queried in the SQL
> select
> into the environment with the name AUTHENTICATE_. This brings
> mod_authn_dbd behaviour in line with mod_authnz_ldap.
>
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Mark Drayton wrote:
...
> Issue #40064 has a patch for Apache 2.2 which changes etag_ulong_to_hex() to
> etag_uint64_to_hex() and avoids casting the mtime to an (arch-dependent)
> unsigned long. We can't move to 2.2 at the moment so instead I patched
> 2.0.
On Aug 31, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Please go for "obvious" algorithms, or simply automate them (as in
the example macro above) rather than "coding in assembler code" for
efficiency, dropping even the slightest trace of explanation what
the code is intended to do, and leaving un
On Aug 30, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
My intent is to T&R all 3 tomorrow (Friday, the 31st) with
a potential announcement Wednesday, Sept 5th. This is
because Monday is a holiday in the states, so that means
mostly a 3 day weekend for most people...
Due to some last minute patch
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:32:56AM -0700, Chris Darroch wrote:
>I think you're right about the problem you're encountering;
> the patches for 2.2.x await a third vote and so they're not in
> expected in 2.2.5/6, as it stands at the moment.
I am using the trunk version of mod_dbd.c with 2.2.4 s
Hi,
In order for URLs proxied using RewriteRule with the P-flag to benefit from
proxy worker connection pools, I have experimented a modification of mod_proxy
that implicitly creates a new worker whenever no worker is found for a request.
The patch below is against proxy_util.c of Apache 2.2.4.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 12:54:44PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > Here's a patch to eliminate the "13", and to improve portability to
> > EBCDIC machines by using apr_toupper().
>
> Thanks for this - the fooness really needed to be sorted out before it was
> rolled out over the other authn mecha
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 05:09:34PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote:
>
> Should I commit, or do you?
Forgot to mention that I meant: commit to trunk.
For 2.2.x, I'd prefer you do it.
Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| Fujitsu Siemens
http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html | 81730 Mu
Is it still fair for me to think this patch will be backported to the
new 2.0.61 AKA 'old' 2.0.60 (because of APR issues) or should I hold out
for 2.0.62? (sounds like a rhetorical question)
Also since I'm new to the development/release cycle used on this list, I
was wondering if there are other w
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Martin Kraemer
> Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2007 17:13
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Eliminate "13" in
> modules/aaa/mod_authn_dbd.c / modules/aaa/mod_authnz_ldap.c
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 05:09:34PM +0200, Martin Kraemer
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2007 16:02
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In order for URLs proxied using RewriteRule with t
>>> On 8/30/2007 at 4:36 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Eric Covener"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/30/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>> On 8/29/2007 at 7:51 PM, in message
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Eric Covener"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > In 2.2.x If authz_X
On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2007 16:02
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
Hi,
In order
On 30.08.2007, at 15:02, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yes, the CHANGES file will be updated to reflect any
and all security issues for that release...
And can someone please also update the NOTICE file to carry the new
copyright date? We are near to the end of 2007 and the file still
says 2006; se
17 matches
Mail list logo
