+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Rather than call it X-Sendfile, can we perhaps adopt the generic
Script-Control header mechanism as outlined in CGI 1.2.
http://cgi-spec.golux.com/cgi-120-00a.html
As one example of how Script-Control has been used, see:
http://www.openvms-rocks.com/ht_root/src/httpd/cgi.c
I have been conte
+1 on concept.
Shouldn't we consider moving X-Sendfile into another module or the core?
It can be useful for regular CGIs or proxied stuff too..
André Malo wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> There's a new gateway module implementing the SCGI protocol[1] and I'd like
> to add it to the tree within the nex
Hi folks,
There's a new gateway module implementing the SCGI protocol[1] and I'd like
to add it to the tree within the next days. I've uploaded everything about
it here:
http://people.apache.org/~nd/mod_proxy_scgi/
complete.patch contains mod_proxy_scgi.c, mod_proxy_scgi.xml, config.m4 of
the
