The documentation is indeed confusing at times, especially when using
vs.net2005.
You can poke around here if you like
http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/knowledge/tutorials/x64 its a bit out of
date (just don't change the platform to x64).
wrowe:
I'm going to redo the tutorial and place it on
Hi folks,
Per the patch submission suggestion # 1:
[[
Be persistent but polite. Post to the developers list pointing out
your patch and why you feel it is important. Feel free to do this
about once a week and continue until you get a response. Just be sure
to be polite about it, since
On Oct 23, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Alternative opinions?
Alternative implementations are welcomed.
On Oct 24, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Alternative opinions?
Alternative implementations are welcomed.
Certainly one trade-off would be speed over space; having
pid_table an actual (C) array of pids. When setting we would
On 10/24/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Alternative opinions?
Alternative implementations are welcomed.
Certainly one trade-off would be speed over space; having
On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Should I look at something like the above?
please ;)
I did a quick and dirty profile and we do save space (of
course, plus it's static space, as in non-growing) and
speed as well, even worse case.
Looking at the below... testing as we speak:
Index: main/http_main.c
===
--- main/http_main.c(revision 587509)
+++ main/http_main.c(working copy)
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@
/*
* Parent process local storage of child pids
*/
On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking at the below... testing as we speak:
Testing past and placed it on a test server which gets
hit with goodly amounts of traffic. So far, so good :)
Will give 24hrs and commit.
On 10/24/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking at the below... testing as we speak:
Testing past and placed it on a test server which gets
hit with goodly amounts of traffic. So far, so good :)
The patch looks fine to me,
Holger Moser wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding request uri rewriting in an request_handler,
right now i do this by overwriting the request_rec-uri element which
works but leads to a second
call of my request handler (it seems that apache recognizes the change
and fires a new request with
Hello,
I am looking for any good hint to cache data into a apr pool or
whatever used to cache data in some memory to avoid too much time
sql / ldap servers.
Is there any hints about using builtin cache in apache when making a
module ?
Thanks,
/Xavier
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
I am looking for any good hint to cache data into a apr pool or whatever
used to cache data in some memory to avoid too much time sql / ldap
servers.
Is there any hints about using builtin cache in apache when making a
module ?
The mod_authnz_ldap module supports
On 10/22/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like 2.0/2.2/trunk
attached is an updated patch for the boil-the-ocean flavor; at the
bottom is a tiny alternative
some ways to slice through the big patch:
1. my BIG 1.3 patch vs. the 2.0 commit
essentially same changes except for
On 10/24/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking at the below... testing as we speak:
Testing past and placed it on a test server which gets
hit with goodly amounts
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-10-10 14:13:31 -0400 (Wed, 10 Oct 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.2 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-10-20 13:55:18 -0400 (Sat, 20 Oct 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-22 16:41:03 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained
17 matches
Mail list logo
