Is it possible to add some flags to the EOS metadata bucket? For example,
to have a 'continuation' EOS bucket, which would cause the MPM to
'replay' the original http request after a certain time (or on demand).
In essence there would be 2 separate requests, but they would share the
same
I recently contributed a new %k log format that is intended to log how
many requests have been handled on the current connection. It does this
by logging the value of conn-keepalives.
However, conn-keepalives isn't, strictly speaking, the number of
requests the connection has handled. If
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Ohad Lutzky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We've been using flood for a project, and couldn't get revision 672044
to compile in gcc-4.2.3-2ubuntu7 without the attached patch. The error
we got was:
flood_round_robin.c: In function 'round_robin_profile_init':
Just a piece of advice that, had I'd received it, would have saved me
a couple days of yak shaving. -T
===
--- INSTALL (revision 695999)
+++ INSTALL (working copy)
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
include a sufficiently
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Ohad Lutzky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From flood_report_relative_times.c (SVN):
/* FIXME: this call may need to be in a critical section */
#if APR_HAS_THREADS
apr_file_printf(local_stdout, %s %ld %s\n, buf,
apr_os_thread_current(), req-uri);
#else
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a piece of advice that, had I'd received it, would have saved me a
couple days of yak shaving. -T
Doh. =)
Committed in r696006. Thanks. -- justin
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the fact that Jim plans to TR 2.2.10 mid-, late September
I triaged through the STATUS file. There are 10 proposal left
where 6 of them only miss one vote. From the remaining 4 with only
one vote two are still
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
The following patch against trunk adds dynamic locking callbacks to mod_ssl.
OpenSSL uses these in several places, including the CHIL engine that
interfaces with the nCipher products. I work at nCipher, and this
On 09/16/2008 09:05 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the fact that Jim plans to TR 2.2.10 mid-, late September
I triaged through the STATUS file. There are 10 proposal left
where 6 of them only miss one vote. From the
On 09/16/2008 10:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jerenkrantz
Date: Tue Sep 16 13:41:45 2008
New Revision: 696047
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696047view=rev
Log:
Fix up flood_subst_file implementation so that we compile again on Mac OS X.
Also fix up various nits, add
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
C++ style comments are not liked by all C compilers.
I suppose the proper answer then is
/* //# why mess around, therefore static */
? ;-) Justin, I think you could have dropped the #
On 09/16/2008 11:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jerenkrantz
Date: Tue Sep 16 14:13:02 2008
New Revision: 696062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696062view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Propose minor docco fix for backport.
I think we only vote on code and not on docco.
So IMHO you could
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we only vote on code and not on docco.
So IMHO you could backport without votes.
Ya, but since I only made the commit to trunk this morning, I figured
I'd let it sit. If Jim wants to backport, he can. -- justin
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+bb = apr_brigade_create(r-pool, c-bucket_alloc);
This is bad. Please store the brigade in the filter context and reuse it,
by cleaning it. See also
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
How do I enable lingering_close in Apache.Is it enabled by default in
Apache 2.2.8 ?
yes.
Is there anyway to check it.
Trace the system calls. On Linux, you can run strace against one of the
worker
This looks reasonable to me but I haven't had a chance to test it
myself.
Guy
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 11:47 +0300, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
Hello,
We've been using flood for a project, and couldn't get revision 672044
to compile in gcc-4.2.3-2ubuntu7 without the attached patch. The error
we got
I'll fix that.
Guy
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 14:40 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ //# why mess around, therefore static
C++ style comments are not liked by all C compilers.
True, but if you look at the hardcoded
Sorry, that's called 'too much Perl'.
Guy
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 16:36 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
C++ style comments are not liked by all C compilers.
I suppose the proper answer then is
/* //# why mess around, therefore static */
? ;-) Justin, I
I'll fix that! And the stub code. WRT to gcc-4.2.3-2ubuntu7 of Sept
3, 2008, I don't have access to that environment but it looks correct to
me. I'll be able to get gcc-4.2.3 but only on Mandriva.
sorry,
Guy
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 14:41 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008
19 matches
Mail list logo
