On Oct 9, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Greg Ames wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am currently looking at PR45605 (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45605
)
and the analysis and the resulting patch in Comment 4 look good to me
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody see problems with this or are we still too worried about
the correct handling of signed vs. unsigned variables by apr_atomic_
to use this in a non experimental MPM?
signed vs unsigned doesn't bother me.
Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd
like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to
release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll
close the vote on Tues AM.
On Fri, October 10, 2008 3:36 pm, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd
like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to release on
Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll
close the vote on Tues AM.
After all my positive testing, thus
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will take a look at the APR atomics and see if the operations that
Event's fdqueue is using are less supported than the atomics used in
worker.
No difference in support on ia32 + gcc; both worker and event use two mutex
thanks you all for the feedback. I will give a try on these alternatives... :)
best,
Vinicius
Hello,
I have just reported a bug in modssl which was already reported earlier here
in more details.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45107
Thanks in advance for considering the proposed patch.
Peter Sylvester
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Jess Holle wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Did you check whether the currently running thread proxy_ajp connect timeout
fix.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200810.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
and
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200810.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
Running stable in a production environment here.
Haven't notice any problems
+1
Jorge
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd
like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to
release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll
close the vote on Tues AM.
+1 for release
--
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd
like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to
release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll
close the vote on Tues AM.
I've upgraded eos.apache.org and aurora.apache.org to 2.2.10, which are
11 matches
Mail list logo