Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: Whichever way this goes, a big thanks for all your work on Netware. +1 and a huge 'wish you were here' Brad!!! I'm not pushing to 'break' netware, but rather, deciding to do once it is broken. The situation is very similar to Wk2 and NT4SP6 which are abandoned, but in t

Ideas for content-aware filter modules for 2.4

2009-03-26 Thread Nick Kew
Following the BoF, I'll put down a brief marker on-list on the theme of content-awareness. More when I'm back home and not totally knackered. We have handling of certain important encodings: SSL and compression (albeit not quite bug-free) as standard in current versions. I'd be interested to ex

Re: [Problem] Not able to Link APR to my programs

2009-03-26 Thread Jens Frey
Well thnx guys... I tried, as proposed by various users and developers in response to my query, using the -I. That too did not work. Finally I managed to serve my purpose using gcc command, executing apr-$installedversion-config file (ie apr-1- config installed in /usr/local/apr/bin in my c

Re: [Problem] Not able to Link APR to my programs

2009-03-26 Thread SAMEER KUMAR
Well thnx guys... I tried, as proposed by various users and developers in response to my > query, using the -I. That too did not > work. Finally I managed to serve my purpose using gcc command, executing > apr-$installedversion-config file (ie apr-1-config installed in > /usr/local/apr/bin in my c

mod_lua: package.loaded == apache2 (bug)

2009-03-26 Thread Peter Cawley
The function apl_load_apache2_lmodule, which is meant to load the apache2 library is flawed in that it loads the library into the package.loaded table and sets this as the global "apache2". It should load it into a new table, and set this as the global "apache2" and package.loaded.apache2. What fol

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 26.03.2009 19:25, Brad Nicholes wrote: > > Pull it. > > It's been a good run and I really had a lot of fun porting and maintaining > Apache for NetWare. > But I guess it's time to say goodbye (to Apache for NetWare, not me ;) I will try to hang > around and maintain the older versions, if

Re: [PATCH] mod_dbd with more than one pool

2009-03-26 Thread Chris Darroch
Ronald Park wrote: I did have one minor nit to pick with the implementation of the DBDInitSQL command. A user might presume that the order of commands listed in the config file would be preserved when the commands are run. By using a hash table, you'll likely get a random order causing prob

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 3/26/2009 at 12:07 PM, in message , Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote: > >> >>> On 3/26/2009 at 11:55 AM, in message >> <49cb6d2b02ac0003c...@lucius.provo.novell.com>, "Brad Nicholes" >> wrote: >> On 3/26/2009 at 11:14 AM, in message <49c

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote: > >>> On 3/26/2009 at 11:55 AM, in message > <49cb6d2b02ac0003c...@lucius.provo.novell.com>, "Brad Nicholes" > wrote: > On 3/26/2009 at 11:14 AM, in message <49cbb7d9.80...@rowe-clan.net>, > "William > > A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > >> tr

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 3/26/2009 at 11:55 AM, in message <49cb6d2b02ac0003c...@lucius.provo.novell.com>, "Brad Nicholes" wrote: On 3/26/2009 at 11:14 AM, in message <49cbb7d9.80...@rowe-clan.net>, "William > A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: >> traw...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> Votes: >>> >>> [+1] yank BeOS M

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote: > >>> On 3/26/2009 at 11:14 AM, in message <49cbb7d9.80...@rowe-clan.net>, > "William > A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > > traw...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >> Votes: > >> > >> [+1] yank BeOS MPM from trunk > >> [+1] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk > > > > and

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 3/26/2009 at 11:14 AM, in message <49cbb7d9.80...@rowe-clan.net>, >>> "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > traw...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Votes: >> >> [+1] yank BeOS MPM from trunk >> [+1] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk > > and for completeness >[+1] yank Netware from trunk > > Netware is 'do

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
traw...@gmail.com wrote: Votes: [+1] yank BeOS MPM from trunk [+1] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk and for completeness [+1] yank Netware from trunk Netware is 'done' - surely some will use it for another 5 years but not for 'new software'. Their 2.2 build is sufficient IMHO. A totally separate

Re: HTTP pipelining in keep-alive requests

2009-03-26 Thread Ronald Park
It looks like it's interpreting the whole 'bla bla blaGET' as the method for the second request. Is there a two or three sets of '/r/n' (or just '/n' in Windows?) after the header in the first message; if three, perhaps it's interpreting the first message as a POST with no body? Ron On Thu, Mar

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 26.03.2009 15:36, traw...@gmail.com wrote: > > Votes: > > [ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk > [ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk > > (I'm +1 on both votes) > +1 on both. The stay in svn and can resurrect if somebody really cares. Regards Rüdiger

Re: Set-Cookie

2009-03-26 Thread Joe Lewis
Marco Spinetti wrote: Thanks very much. So I have to use: apr_table_add(r->headers_out, "Set-Cookie", co); apr_table_add(r->headers_out, "Set-Cookie", co1); Rather than playing with a proxy or fireway gateway that could remove one of your set cookie headers (because you have multiple), you ma

Re: Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread trawick
On Mar 26, 2009 11:49am, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Mar 26, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 26.03.2009 09:04, Jeff Trawick wrote: [ ] MPM from trunk wouldn't build/serve a page on Linux prior to changes for MPM DSO support[ ] MPM from last 2.2.x release wouldn't build/serv

Re: svn commit: r758597 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/config.m4

2009-03-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.03.2009 13:25, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Paul Querna wrote: I think the default should be event for the time being. +1 Rainer

Re: svn commit: r758597 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/config.m4

2009-03-26 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 26.03.2009 13:25, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Paul Querna wrote: >> I think the default should be event for the time being. > > +1. -- justin > > +1. Regards Rüdiger

moving event out of experimental

2009-03-26 Thread trawick
anyone opposed? this is just "svn move experimental/event ." and "svn delete experimental", right? (as well as fixing the other dangling bits, checking if documentation is in order, etc.)

Re: svn commit: r758597 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/config.m4

2009-03-26 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > I think the default should be event for the time being. +1. -- justin

Re: svn commit: r758597 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/config.m4

2009-03-26 Thread Paul Querna
As much as i would like to use simple, I don't think its quite ready yet (time/patches welcome!). I think the default should be event for the time being. 2009/3/26 : > Author: jim > Date: Thu Mar 26 11:09:33 2009 > New Revision: 758597 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=758597&view=rev >

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Mar 26, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 26.03.2009 09:04, Jeff Trawick wrote: [ ] MPM from trunk wouldn't build/serve a page on Linux prior to changes for MPM DSO support[ ] MPM from last 2.2.x release wouldn't build/ serve a page on Linux [ ] Brad/Brian/David speak up rega

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > 2009/3/26 Ruediger Pluem : > > We should axe > > > > leader > > perchild > > threadpool > > > > immediately in trunk as IMHO they are not maintained for years. > > +1. -- justin > I'm working on removing these three; the task consists

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
2009/3/26 Ruediger Pluem : > We should axe > > leader > perchild > threadpool > > immediately in trunk as IMHO they are not maintained for years. +1. -- justin

Re: Set-Cookie

2009-03-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 26.03.2009 10:07, Marco Spinetti wrote: Ok, I have to use apr_table_add instead od apr_table_set. So I should write: apr_table_add(r->headers_out, "Set-Cookie", co); apr_table_add(r->headers_out, "Set-Cookie", co1); If I write: apr_table_set(r->headers_out, "Set-Cookie", co); apr_table_merg

Re: Set-Cookie

2009-03-26 Thread Marco Spinetti
Ok, I have to use apr_table_add instead od apr_table_set. So I should write: apr_table_add(r->headers_out, "Set-Cookie", co); apr_table_add(r->headers_out, "Set-Cookie", co1); If I write: apr_table_set(r->headers_out, "Set-Cookie", co); apr_table_merge(r->headers_out, "Set-Cookie", co1); is it

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Nick Kew
On 26 Mar 2009, at 08:18, Ruediger Pluem wrote: We should axe leader perchild threadpool Criterion: those MPMs that pre-date 2.2 but are not included in it need to be shoved away in a dusty attic. Looks like the above list. -- Nick Kew

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Paul Querna
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > We should axe > > leader > perchild > threadpool > > immediately in trunk as IMHO they are not maintained for years. > I am not quite sure how much care the platform specific MPMs for OS2 and > BEOS get. Novell seems to be still maintained b

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 26.03.2009 09:04, Jeff Trawick wrote: > [ ] MPM from trunk wouldn't build/serve a page on Linux prior to changes > for MPM DSO support[ ] MPM from last 2.2.x release wouldn't build/serve a > page on Linux > [ ] Brad/Brian/David speak up regarding the several non-Unix MPMs > [ ] ??? > > If s

criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-03-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
[ ] MPM from trunk wouldn't build/serve a page on Linux prior to changes for MPM DSO support[ ] MPM from last 2.2.x release wouldn't build/serve a page on Linux [ ] Brad/Brian/David speak up regarding the several non-Unix MPMs [ ] ??? If somebody is actively using something besides (WinNT, pre

Re: HTTP pipelining in keep-alive requests

2009-03-26 Thread Andrea Martino
The output log contains the following: [Thu Mar 26 08:09:17 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.50] File does not exist: C:/Programmi/Apache Software Foundation/Apache2.2/htdocs/endpoint [Thu Mar 26 08:09:17 2009] [error] [client 192.168.1.50] Invalid URI in request bla bla blaGET /description HTTP

Re: current status of loadable MPM changes

2009-03-26 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On 24 Mar 2009, at 21:45, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > something I'm in a relative hurry to get feedback on is this part: >> >> 2. retain data >> >> How can MPMs retain data across unload of the DSO? >> s->process->server_pool userdata >> won't

Re: HTTP pipelining in keep-alive requests

2009-03-26 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 26.03.2009 08:11, Andrea Martino wrote: > Hi Rüdiger, > I understand the request is not correct, but httpd answers anyway (at least > the version installed on my pc): What is the output of the error log and the access log? Which version do you use? What is the Timeout setting on your server? D

Re: HTTP pipelining in keep-alive requests

2009-03-26 Thread Andrea Martino
Hi Rüdiger, I understand the request is not correct, but httpd answers anyway (at least the version installed on my pc): To the previous request, my httpd answers as following: |<-- from here -->| HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:09:17 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.11 (Win32) PHP/5.2.9