Re: svn commit: r769020 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy: balancers/mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c balancers/mod_lbmethod_byrequests.c balancers/mod_lbmethod_bytraffic.c balancers/mod_lbmethod_heartbe

2009-04-30 Thread jean-frederic clere
j...@apache.org wrote: Author: jim Date: Mon Apr 27 15:02:40 2009 New Revision: 769020 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=769020view=rev Log: Fold in initial template for methods to be able to reset (initialize) and age their data, useful when adding new workers, or when workers come back

Re: svn commit: r769020 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy: balancers/mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c balancers/mod_lbmethod_byrequests.c balancers/mod_lbmethod_bytraffic.c balancers/mod_lbmethod_heartbe

2009-04-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Apr 30, 2009, at 4:04 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: j...@apache.org wrote: Author: jim Date: Mon Apr 27 15:02:40 2009 New Revision: 769020 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=769020view=rev Log: Fold in initial template for methods to be able to reset (initialize) and age their data,

Re: 2.2.12 ?

2009-04-30 Thread Gregg L. Smith
So does this mean we can expect to see 2.2.12 soon? Regards, Gregg jean-frederic clere wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: On 21.04.2009 08:48, jean-frederic clere wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Hi, I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked to plop directly in

Re: svn commit: r770293 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c

2009-04-30 Thread jean-frederic clere
jfcl...@apache.org wrote: Author: jfclere Date: Thu Apr 30 15:43:34 2009 New Revision: 770293 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=770293view=rev Log: Prevent key=value being accepted as url. There is still more to do... Things like: Proxy balancer://mycluster BalancerMember

Re: 2.2.12 ?

2009-04-30 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 04/30/2009 05:51 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote: So does this mean we can expect to see 2.2.12 soon? Jim said that he thinks about tagging somewhere in May. I hope to get the SNI patches summarized in a backportable way by then to have them included in 2.2.12. OTOH it looks like that we need

Re: 2.2.12 ?

2009-04-30 Thread Kaspar Brand
Ruediger Pluem wrote: I hope to get the SNI patches summarized in a backportable way by then to have them included in 2.2.12. Didn't want to rush things, but since there were no objections to the recent trunk commits so far - here's an updated backport for 2.2 (including your improvements from