Hai,
I have apache server where I do graceful restart of the server every half an
hour.. And during this i find the memory size getting increased after every
graceful restart.. At times it reaches 1gb. Is it because of memory leak?
I also checked with the valgrind to figure out the memory
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:01:55PM -, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009
New Revision: 790205
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790205view=rev
Log:
mod_noloris just moved from discussion to attracting its first patch
on d...@. That means it wants to
On Jul 2, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:01:55PM -, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009
New Revision: 790205
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790205view=rev
Log:
mod_noloris just moved from discussion to attracting its
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 03:55:27PM +0200, Natanael Mignon - michael-wessel.de
wrote:
I am currently working on - dirty, please have mercy - customizations
of mod_ssl and especially OCSP-handling for a specific project (on
basis of Apache 2.3 code). As I am neither a seasoned C-coder nor
Joe Orton wrote:
1) A *linear-time* search on a shm segment, using strstr.
2) ... for each new connection.
With the expectation that the shm segment normally has strlen
of zero, and even under attack is just a few bytes.
3) On a shm segment which will get modified in-place by another
On 7/2/09 8:37 AM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
Not everyone who's concerned right now about slowloris has
iptables at their disposal.
Also, not everyone has access to the real IP very early in the connection
phase. Some load balancers add the IP as a header. Generally speaking,
most
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:37:22PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
1) A *linear-time* search on a shm segment, using strstr.
2) ... for each new connection.
With the expectation that the shm segment normally has strlen
of zero, and even under attack is just a few bytes.
As far as
Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:37:22PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
1) A *linear-time* search on a shm segment, using strstr.
2) ... for each new connection.
With the expectation that the shm segment normally has strlen
of zero, and even under attack is just a few
All,
I just wanted to point someone to a recent snapshot of 2.2 branch, but
found that there is none; we only have 2.0 branch and HEAD ...
I think it would make sense to add 2.2 branch snapshots.
Also when on that topic: we have apr/apr-util snapshots of 0.9 and 1.0
branch, but none of 1.2 / 1.3 /
