Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12

2009/7/17 Nick Kew : > I've a faint recollection of someone raising this issue, > but a quick google didn't find it. Do you have a test-case > that provokes the bug you're fixing? http://markmail.org/message/jlc7t5edsjujbe37 ;-) Bob

Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12

Lars Eilebrecht wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday... I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an SSI-related bug causing a segfault when handling regex back-references (see att

Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12

On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday... I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an SSI-related bug causing a segfault when handling

Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12

Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: If you have time (fix in trunk, backport proposal) I will have a look at the proposal and vote on it to get it in. +1. Segfault sounds serious enough to prioritise! -- Nick Kew

RE: Intent to T&R 2.2.12

> -Original Message- > From: Lars Eilebrecht > Sent: Freitag, 17. Juli 2009 15:49 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12 > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent > > to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday... > > I j

Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12

Jim Jagielski wrote: > Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent > to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday... I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an SSI-related bug causing a segfault when handling regex back-references (see attachment). I didn't pro

Intent to T&R 2.2.12

Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...