backport of 630858

2009-08-11 Thread Peter Sylvester
Hi, can someone make a backport of 630858 * modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c (ssl_init_FindCAList): Cast return value of sk_X509_NAME_set_cmp_func to void, to avoid warnings with recent version of OpenSSL. --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c 2008/02/22 11:36:51 630163 +++

Re: backport of 630858

2009-08-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Peter, Peter Sylvester schrieb: > can someone make a backport of 630858 > > * modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c (ssl_init_FindCAList): Cast return > value of sk_X509_NAME_set_cmp_func to void, to avoid warnings with > recent version of OpenSSL. > > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init

Re: Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi Guys, On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:36:29 UTC, traw...@gmail.com wrote: > * The last OS/2-specific MPM change I can find was in 2003 > (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=101826). > > Votes: > > [ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk > [ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk > > (I'm +1 on both votes) S

Re: Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley < pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:36:29 UTC, traw...@gmail.com wrote: > > > * The last OS/2-specific MPM change I can find was in 2003 > > (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=101826). > > > > Vot

Re: Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Paul Smedley
Hi Jeff, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:09:13 UTC, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley < > pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au> wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:36:29 UTC, traw...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > * The last OS/2-specific MPM change I can find w

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Nick Kew
Paul Smedley wrote: [ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk [ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk (I'm +1 on both votes) Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2 maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role. I've been building Apache2 on OS/2 for the last 4 years or so, I

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Graham Leggett
Paul Smedley wrote: > Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2 > maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role. > > I've been building Apache2 on OS/2 for the last 4 years or so, I just > enver got around to submitting patches. If the support is pulled, it

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Paul, Paul Smedley schrieb: >> I hope you've noticed that the OS/2 MPM is gone from trunk ;) > > Actually no, as I just build from the tar.bz2 on each release :) hehe, our snapshots are stalled for the last 15 months - so either checkout from SVN, or get snapshots from my home: http://people.ap

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
Jeff Trawick schrieb: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley > mailto:pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au>> > wrote: > Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2 > maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role. > > > I hope you've noticed that the OS/

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Nick Kew
Guenter Knauf wrote: Jeff Trawick schrieb: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley mailto:pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au>> wrote: Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2 maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role. I hope you've noticed that

Re: [VOTE] httpd 2.2.13 candidate

2009-08-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gregg L. Smith wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> +/-1 >>> [+1] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA >> >> This is looking fine on windows, is up at /dev/dist as -src-win32, >> and binaries will follow in the morning. > > non-binding +9/10 on Windows. Please see PR 47659 for the last 1/10. > This

Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13

2009-08-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
all, Guenter Knauf schrieb: > good idea! Based on this here modified samples: > http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/releases.txt > http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt > and final result: > http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.html before it again vanish

Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13

2009-08-11 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 08/11/2009 07:40 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > all, > Guenter Knauf schrieb: >> good idea! Based on this here modified samples: >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/releases.txt >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt >> and final result: >> http://people.apache.org/

Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13

2009-08-11 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > all, > Guenter Knauf schrieb: >> good idea! Based on this here modified samples: >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/releases.txt >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt >> and final result: >> http://people.apac

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Brian Havard
Nick Kew wrote: > Paul Smedley wrote: > >>> [ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk >>> [ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk >>> >>> (I'm +1 on both votes) >> >> Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2 >> maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role. >> >> I've been building Apac

backport request for patch 787683

2009-08-11 Thread Peter Sylvester
Someone mind to backport this to 2.2.x ? thanks /P *787683* --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_vars.c 2009/05/27 05:41:07 779005 +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_vars.c 2009/06/23 14:10:06 787683 @@

Re: [VOTE] httpd 2.2.13 candidate

2009-08-11 Thread Gregg L. Smith
Well, on any day I would normally say "ok, it's this quirky machine," but not on this. This happened to someone else as well. Both on VC6 and 9. Modern cmd.exe shells? XP SP3 or is it Vista? This is XP SP2 I am using. I've thought some on it as well since and I can think of possibly a better app

Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree

2009-08-11 Thread Graham Leggett
Brian Havard wrote: > I know I've been absent for a long time but I once again have a bit of > spare time so I can review, test & commit patches from Paul. Does anyone > object if I start by bringing the OS/2 MPM back from the dead? > Specifically, reversing r758899? +1, go ahead. Regards, Graha

Study on communication and collaboration in software development teams

2009-08-11 Thread Martin Gelhaus
Dear Apache HTTP Server developer, within the scope of my diploma thesis at the University of Paderborn, Germany, with the title "Study about communication and collaboration in software development in teams" I am conducting a survey of members of software development teams. I would be very gra

makefile.win DBM fix Was Re: [VOTE] httpd 2.2.13 candidate

2009-08-11 Thread Gregg L. Smith
It works, finds just x and goes happily on its way past it as it should. cd ..\dbm for %d in ( x) do if not %d == x NMAKE -f apr_dbm_%d.mak CFG="apr_dbm_%d - Win32 Release" RECURSE=0 C:\build\httpd-2.2.x-dev\srclib\apr-util\dbm>if not x == x NMAKE -f apr_dbm_x.mak CFG="apr_dbm_x - Win32 Rele