Certificate chain order not conform to TLS standard

Hello, I get problems with a picky SSL client complaining that Apache does not send the certificate chain in the right order (server/CA/root). Is that possible? Doesn't Apache (I am using 2.2.4) honor the RFC? Thanks, Nick

RE: Certificate chain order not conform to TLS standard

-Original Message- From: Nick Gearls [mailto:nickgea...@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 12. August 2009 16:32 To: Development Apache Subject: Certificate chain order not conform to TLS standard Hello, I get problems with a picky SSL client complaining that Apache does not

A single IP address and Domain name serving many servers

I want to know if its possible and how to do it... I have one valid ip address and one internet domain. What I want to do is: - when a client access my domain with: www.mydomain.com on his web browser he access my apache server apache1.localnetwork 10.0.0.1 (I already do this through nat in

Re: A single IP address and Domain name serving many servers

You can do this with mod proxy. # Proxy Forwarding IfModule !mod_proxy.c LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so /IfModule ProxyRequests Off Proxy * Order allow,deny Allow from all /Proxy #forward /siteX

$ as literal in DirectoryMatch

The undocumented behavior of suppressing the significance of '$' in DirectoryMatch'es argument came up on IRC today. ap_directory_walk() uses the AP_REG_NOTEOL macro to ask for this behavior. Does anyone recall the rationale before documenting the current behavior? Somewhat unusually, 1.3 doc

Balancer-manager, nonce, and xml

I found something in proxy and was wondering if it was intentional: In proxy_balancer, we check the nonce param and clear the params if incorrect or missing, however, then you can't view it in xml unless you include the nonce, because the xml param is no longer available. I was trying to get one

Re: Balancer-manager, nonce, and xml

On 08/12/2009 08:11 PM, Akins, Brian wrote: I found something in proxy and was wondering if it was intentional: In proxy_balancer, we check the nonce param and clear the params if incorrect or missing, however, then you can't view it in xml unless you include the nonce, because the xml

Re: $ as literal in DirectoryMatch

Eric Covener wrote: The undocumented behavior of suppressing the significance of '$' in DirectoryMatch'es argument came up on IRC today. ap_directory_walk() uses the AP_REG_NOTEOL macro to ask for this behavior. Does anyone recall the rationale before documenting the current behavior?