-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> Guenter, please confirm if you are casting a veto, or in light of
> this earlier discussion and rationale, you are just expressing your
> standing distaste for the patch (which is -0)?
For the record, I also agree with
mod_fcgid freinds;
Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.1.tar.gz (or bz2)
or the win32 suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.1-crlf.zip from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice
[ ] -1 for any release of 2.3.1 (regressed from 2.3.0
Let's see if this is it...
Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.5.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
win32/netware/os2 suitable package mod_ftp-0.9.5-crlf.zip from;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/
review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice
[ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.5 (re
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> Hi,
>> William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
>>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
> According to Jeff:
>
>> A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
>> I don't see anything that looks like a
Hi,
I want to write tiny module which measure cpu time (on unix like system) for
each request and write down values into the log. I think implement it by
getrusage().
First hook (e.g. ap_hook_post_read_request) in this module should be called
before the same hook in any other modules (I think
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Udo Rader wrote:
> Typically, certificate based authentication needs to be "supported" by LDAP,
> the latter translating the certificate subjects into "real" usernames,
> useable by external applications via REMOTE_USER.
A change to mod_ssl to allow SSLUserName-lik
Technically what's being attempted here is a lookup rather than authentication.
The intention is to do a query using the cert info to get back the uid from LDAP
(as opposed to an LDAP connect with a password followed by a query).
Currently the LDAP code only provides Authentication and/or Author
Graham Leggett wrote:
Udo Rader wrote:
Maybe a more concrete sample can help clarify what I am talking about,
here's my approximate setup:
SSLVerifyClient require
SSLRequireSSL
SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth
AuthName "Snake Oil Authentication"
AuthType Basic
AuthBasicProvider ldap
A
Udo Rader wrote:
> Maybe a more concrete sample can help clarify what I am talking about,
> here's my approximate setup:
>
>
> SSLVerifyClient require
> SSLRequireSSL
>
> SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth
> AuthName "Snake Oil Authentication"
> AuthType Basic
> AuthBasicProvider ldap
> Au
Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Udo Rader wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth
AuthName "Snake Oil Authentication"
AuthType Basic
AuthBasicProvider ldap
AuthLDAPRemoteUserAttribute uid
AuthLDAPURL ldap://127.0.0.1/dc=example,dc=com?subjectDN?one
req
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Udo Rader wrote:
> Graham Leggett wrote:
>>
> SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth
> AuthName "Snake Oil Authentication"
> AuthType Basic
> AuthBasicProvider ldap
> AuthLDAPRemoteUserAttribute uid
>
> AuthLDAPURL ldap://127.0.0.1/dc=example,dc=com?subjectDN?one
> requir
Graham Leggett wrote:
Udo Rader wrote:
I am just trying to set up a X.509 client certificates + LDAP based
authorizaton system.
I've setup all pieces best to my knowledge (mod_ssl, mod_auth_basic,
mod_auth_ldap), but I am still having problems to connect to our LDAP
server because "SSLOption F
On 06.09.2009 22:38, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 September 2009, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> I guess
>>
>> reqtimeout_after_body
>>
>> also needs to be updated to the assert / do nothing if not
>> configured logic like reqtimeout_after_headers
>>
>
> Thanks, I missed that. I fixed it and a
Udo Rader wrote:
> I am just trying to set up a X.509 client certificates + LDAP based
> authorizaton system.
>
> I've setup all pieces best to my knowledge (mod_ssl, mod_auth_basic,
> mod_auth_ldap), but I am still having problems to connect to our LDAP
> server because "SSLOption FakeBasicAuth"
Jeff Barnes wrote:
> I obsoleted the .8 file and attached the svn diff for the xml file.
>
> Should the ab.8 file be removed from svn if it gets overwritten with each
> documentation generation?
No moreso than the .html files, all generated from xml. We don't expect
typical developers to instal
15 matches
Mail list logo