The mod_info test (t/modules/info.t) asks Apache::Test::config() for a
list of modules. It then expects each of those modules to be reported
by mod_info. But some of those modules are not actually loaded
because of modules which are skipped by TestConfigParse.pm
#XXX mod_jk requires JkWorkerFile
Guenter Knauf wrote:
> if the reference hash file from www.apache.org is build with gpg then
> this method fails (and I consider gpg really unusable for this purpose);
> here are some bad samples which show that gpg breaks lines if the
> this looks really horrible to me (and I'm curious if some sed
Hi,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
> To put this into perspective, checking an md5 (or sha1) checksum is
> simply a case of doing the following three steps:
>
> - Run md5sum, or openssl, or perl, or whatever you want, and get the md5
> hash string of the binary you downloaded printed out to your terminal
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> So speaking for myself, I am interested.
As am I.
> In fact, if everything builds at the moment against 1.3.x apr (irrespective
> of whether or not all features are enabled) I'm likely to just tag on Sunday
> or Monday, and give testers something to start chewing on
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Yes, I know all that. But the reason I do this is to see if there
> is any sort of support behind this... I've I make this proposal and
> don't see any +1s, then it leaves me to believe that most people
> aren't so interested in doing so, which makes me wonder why.
So spe
On 15.10.2009 21:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Planning on pushing this out to coincide w/ ACUS09... Let's assume
> head of apr 1.4...
+1
On Oct 15, 2009, at 7:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Planning on pushing this out to coincide w/ ACUS09... Let's assume
head of apr 1.4...
-1 veto; that is not released code, and I'm not fond of the idea of
a fork
of apr managed at httpd.
Who said anything abou
On Oct 15, 2009, at 7:56 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Planning on pushing this out to coincide w/ ACUS09... Let's assume
head of apr 1.4...
You've made 'reservations' a number times in the past several years
in STATUS, and
on list, that weren't realized for >1+ mon
Michael Felt wrote:
> my bad - my AddHandler statement was outside the IFModule block (at line
> 69, near the LoadModules, and it worked for years because mod_mime was
> built-in) - so the problem I was having was primarily a user error.
>
> What might be a build issue is all the missing LoadModu
Brian J. France wrote:
> mod_dav_acl would use the filename to validate the acls. Like I said, I
> don't know if get_pathname is needed or we should just use r->filename
> and make sure a mod_dav_fs_db module updated it.
As Joe points out, an ACL could refer to something that wasn't a file,
such
Seema Alevoor wrote:
> Can someone point me to the official announcement page for 2.2.14 ?
> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html still refers
> to 2.2.13 version !
It looks like the same svnpubsub breakage that happened on apr has also
happened on httpd, will pass your message o
Hi,
Can someone point me to the official announcement page for 2.2.14 ?
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html still refers
to 2.2.13 version !
Thanks,
Seema.
12 matches
Mail list logo
