On 2010-02-09 at 09:27, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42912
Developers,
Christian Ress kindly contributed documentation for the Protocol
directive. I'd like to expand it a bit before committing; can anyone
help me with these questions?
1) When
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
1) When you use the Protocol directive, which listening ports is it
applied to?
2) Why would you choose to use the Protocol directive, instead of adding
the protocol to the Listen directive?
Looking at this cold, I think
I'd like to move ahead and catch up to OpenSSL 0.9.8m which was released today,
and that requires a 2.2 release.
Let's start a three day clock to the tag, and I'll tag Sunday about noon CST.
That gives folks friday, and weekend warriors time Saturday to catch up with
final important bugfix
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I'd like to move ahead and catch up to OpenSSL 0.9.8m which was released
today,
and that requires a 2.2 release.
Let's start a three day clock to the tag, and I'll tag Sunday about noon CST.
That gives folks
On 2/24/2010 6:44 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 2/22/2010 11:16 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Mon Feb 22 17:16:29 2010
New Revision: 912666
URL:
Howdy,
Just built libapreq 2.12 on 64 bit CentOS 5.4 with Perl 5.10.1 and Apache
2.2.14, and found two things I wanted to follow up on here:
1. The build initially failed with this error:
/usr/lib/libexpat.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format
This appears to be because I
On 25 Feb 2010, at 11:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I'd like to move ahead and catch up to OpenSSL 0.9.8m which was
released today,
and that requires a 2.2 release.
Let's start a three day clock to the tag, and I'll tag Sunday about
noon CST.
That gives folks friday, and weekend
