Re: Nod to 2.0, one more time?

2010-03-22 Thread Sander Temme
On Mar 22, 2010, at 6:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the > coming days? These security issues aught to be addressed, and while > we are at it, it just seems like a nice thing to do as we get closer > to some 2.3 beta and furthe

Re: Nod to 2.0, one more time?

2010-03-22 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/22/2010 9:51 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 22.03.2010 14:52, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the >> coming days? These security issues aught to be addressed, and while >> we are at it, it just seems like a nice thing to do as we get

Re: Nod to 2.0, one more time?

2010-03-22 Thread Rainer Jung
On 22.03.2010 14:52, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the coming days? These security issues aught to be addressed, and while we are at it, it just seems like a nice thing to do as we get closer to some 2.3 beta and further from any more

Re: Nod to 2.0, one more time?

2010-03-22 Thread Mads Toftum
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:17:41AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Does anyone feel a need to release APR and -Util first to resolve > CVE-2009-2412? I don't think it is so important personally, but it is > worth asking. > Would be nice to get both things done at once to avoid as much pressure for a

Re: Nod to 2.0, one more time?

2010-03-22 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. > wrote: >> Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the >> coming days?  These security issues aught to be addressed, and while >> we are at it, it just seems like

Re: Nod to 2.0, one more time?

2010-03-22 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the > coming days?  These security issues aught to be addressed, and while > we are at it, it just seems like a nice thing to do as we get closer > to some 2.3 beta and fur

Re: Nod to 2.0, one more time?

2010-03-22 Thread Mads Toftum
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:52:13AM -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the > coming days? These security issues aught to be addressed, and while > we are at it, it just seems like a nice thing to do as we get closer > to some 2.3 beta

Nod to 2.0, one more time?

2010-03-22 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
Wondering if we are comfortable tagging and releasing 2.0.64 in the coming days? These security issues aught to be addressed, and while we are at it, it just seems like a nice thing to do as we get closer to some 2.3 beta and further from any more improvements to 2.0. Opinions? Volunteers? If t

ApacheCon NA 2010 HTTP Server Track Call for Participation

2010-03-22 Thread Sander Temme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ApacheCon North America 2010 will be held 1-5 November 2010, at the Westin Peachtree in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. The official conference, trainings and expo of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) will run to Atlanta this November, with dozens of sessi