Hi,
I have a Firefox module that encrypts the body content for a POST and GET
request.
The apache module must decrypt the content and send a crypted reply to the
client.
So, in my apache module, i have a filter to modify the body. For a POST
x-www-form-urlencoded, the content is decrypt but
in
On 10 Jun 2010, at 07:34, Eddy wrote:
How modify (decrypt data) the body content before all module ?
That's what filters do.
See mod_ssl for secure encryption. Or in your case since it's only the
body content, see for example mod_deflate for a comparable task.
--
Nick Kew
For illustrate my problem :
I have register a filter like in deflate :
ap_register_input_filter(PerseusFilterName,perseus_in_filter, NULL,
AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET);
In httpd.conf :
SetInputFilter PERSEUS
So, I test with a crypted content and i hae in error.log :
Perseus handler, Perseus header
On 06/09/2010 10:00 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+#if __STDC_VERSION__ = 199901L defined(APLOG_MAX_LOGLEVEL)
+/* need additional step to expand APLOG_MARK first */
+#define ap_log_perror(...) ap_log_perror__(__VA_ARGS__)
+#define
Hello apache users,
I would like to explain my problem.
I have developed the module which is used for authorization to web pages.
It works fine without problem but I would like to use that module for
authorization
of proxy requests as well.
Proxy requests are not defined in settings of browser
Dear apache users,
sorry for bother you with this question but I have a little problem with
multilanguage support in FF or IE.
My module does not handler like type_checker yet.
in the configuration file of Apache2 I have following:
AddLanguage en .en_US
AddLanguage en-us .en_US
AddLanguage
On 10.06.2010 08:09, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/09/2010 10:00 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+#if __STDC_VERSION__= 199901L defined(APLOG_MAX_LOGLEVEL)
+/* need additional step to expand APLOG_MARK first */
+#define ap_log_perror(...)
On 10 Jun 2010, at 09:37, Petr Hracek wrote:
Dear apache users,
This is the developers list. Users are us...@.
My module does not handler like type_checker yet.
Your module? As opposed to mod_negotiation?
How I should implement type_checker in my module which will modify request so
Could you please help me what spelling is wrong?
I want to add type_checker to my module as last step of course if there will
be no other option.
2010/6/10 Nick Kew n...@webthing.com
On 10 Jun 2010, at 09:37, Petr Hracek wrote:
Dear apache users,
This is the developers list. Users are
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:30:45AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
Just noticed that our shmcb socache never replaces an identical node
on -store, leading to multiple entries for the same id (with different
expiries and data, obviously).
Is this deliberate? What is the distcache/memcached/dbm
Okey dokey... unless I hear otherwise w/i a few hours, I will
tag and roll 2.3.6-alpha
On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Mario Brandt wrote:
Thanks Stefan,
it builds fine.
Mario
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 21:51, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
This should be fixed now and I hopefully
And with a few addt'l patches, it builds clean (excluding some recent
ldap oddities coming from MS's toolchain), thanks for taking a good
look into this Mario.
On 6/8/2010 3:25 PM, Mario Brandt wrote:
Thanks Stefan,
it builds fine.
Mario
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 21:51, Stefan Fritsch
FWIW, I'm holding off based on a proxy/closing connection issue...
On Jun 10, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Okey dokey... unless I hear otherwise w/i a few hours, I will
tag and roll 2.3.6-alpha
On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Mario Brandt wrote:
Thanks Stefan,
it builds fine.
On Monday 07 June 2010, Rainer Jung wrote:
- build most module set by default.
Alternatives are:
- all
- few (same set as was default before the change)
- none
I would like to have an option for developers/testers that builds
every module that can be built with the currently
On 6/10/2010 7:15 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:30:45AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
Just noticed that our shmcb socache never replaces an identical node
on -store, leading to multiple entries for the same id (with different
expiries and data, obviously).
Is this deliberate?
15 matches
Mail list logo