Modify the body of a post request Multipar/form-data?

2010-06-10 Thread Eddy
Hi, I have a Firefox module that encrypts the body content for a POST and GET request. The apache module must decrypt the content and send a crypted reply to the client. So, in my apache module, i have a filter to modify the body. For a POST x-www-form-urlencoded, the content is decrypt but in

Re: Modify the body of a post request Multipar/form-data?

2010-06-10 Thread Nick Kew
On 10 Jun 2010, at 07:34, Eddy wrote: How modify (decrypt data) the body content before all module ? That's what filters do. See mod_ssl for secure encryption. Or in your case since it's only the body content, see for example mod_deflate for a comparable task. -- Nick Kew

Re: Modify the body of a post request Multipar/form-data?

2010-06-10 Thread Eddy
For illustrate my problem : I have register a filter like in deflate : ap_register_input_filter(PerseusFilterName,perseus_in_filter, NULL, AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET); In httpd.conf : SetInputFilter PERSEUS So, I test with a crypted content and i hae in error.log : Perseus handler, Perseus header

Re: svn commit: r951893 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in include/ap_mmn.h include/http_config.h include/http_log.h include/httpd.h server/config.c server/core.c server/log.c server/util_debug.c

2010-06-10 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 06/09/2010 10:00 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Ruediger Pluem wrote: +#if __STDC_VERSION__ = 199901L defined(APLOG_MAX_LOGLEVEL) +/* need additional step to expand APLOG_MARK first */ +#define ap_log_perror(...) ap_log_perror__(__VA_ARGS__) +#define

Authentication of proxy over own module

2010-06-10 Thread Petr Hracek
Hello apache users, I would like to explain my problem. I have developed the module which is used for authorization to web pages. It works fine without problem but I would like to use that module for authorization of proxy requests as well. Proxy requests are not defined in settings of browser

type_checker

2010-06-10 Thread Petr Hracek
Dear apache users, sorry for bother you with this question but I have a little problem with multilanguage support in FF or IE. My module does not handler like type_checker yet. in the configuration file of Apache2 I have following: AddLanguage en .en_US AddLanguage en-us .en_US AddLanguage

Re: svn commit: r951893 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: configure.in include/ap_mmn.h include/http_config.h include/http_log.h include/httpd.h server/config.c server/core.c server/log.c server/util_debug.c

2010-06-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 10.06.2010 08:09, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 06/09/2010 10:00 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Ruediger Pluem wrote: +#if __STDC_VERSION__= 199901L defined(APLOG_MAX_LOGLEVEL) +/* need additional step to expand APLOG_MARK first */ +#define ap_log_perror(...)

Re: type_checker

2010-06-10 Thread Nick Kew
On 10 Jun 2010, at 09:37, Petr Hracek wrote: Dear apache users, This is the developers list. Users are us...@. My module does not handler like type_checker yet. Your module? As opposed to mod_negotiation? How I should implement type_checker in my module which will modify request so

Re: type_checker

2010-06-10 Thread Petr Hracek
Could you please help me what spelling is wrong? I want to add type_checker to my module as last step of course if there will be no other option. 2010/6/10 Nick Kew n...@webthing.com On 10 Jun 2010, at 09:37, Petr Hracek wrote: Dear apache users, This is the developers list. Users are

Re: mod_socache_shmcb bogosity?

2010-06-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:30:45AM -0500, William Rowe wrote: Just noticed that our shmcb socache never replaces an identical node on -store, leading to multiple entries for the same id (with different expiries and data, obviously). Is this deliberate? What is the distcache/memcached/dbm

Re: Alpha of 2.3.6 next week

2010-06-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
Okey dokey... unless I hear otherwise w/i a few hours, I will tag and roll 2.3.6-alpha On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Mario Brandt wrote: Thanks Stefan, it builds fine. Mario On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 21:51, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: This should be fixed now and I hopefully

Re: Alpha of 2.3.6 next week

2010-06-10 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
And with a few addt'l patches, it builds clean (excluding some recent ldap oddities coming from MS's toolchain), thanks for taking a good look into this Mario. On 6/8/2010 3:25 PM, Mario Brandt wrote: Thanks Stefan, it builds fine. Mario On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 21:51, Stefan Fritsch

Re: Alpha of 2.3.6 next week

2010-06-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
FWIW, I'm holding off based on a proxy/closing connection issue... On Jun 10, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Okey dokey... unless I hear otherwise w/i a few hours, I will tag and roll 2.3.6-alpha On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Mario Brandt wrote: Thanks Stefan, it builds fine.

Re: Module build defaults for trunk

2010-06-10 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Monday 07 June 2010, Rainer Jung wrote: - build most module set by default. Alternatives are: - all - few (same set as was default before the change) - none I would like to have an option for developers/testers that builds every module that can be built with the currently

Re: mod_socache_shmcb bogosity?

2010-06-10 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 6/10/2010 7:15 AM, Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:30:45AM -0500, William Rowe wrote: Just noticed that our shmcb socache never replaces an identical node on -store, leading to multiple entries for the same id (with different expiries and data, obviously). Is this deliberate?