Hi all,
It does work now...
Thanks
Best regards,
honercek
http://www.google.com/profiles/honercek
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Chen Chien-Yu honer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Eric,
Yes, you're right. The behavior I said is within the mod_proxy_connect.
I'm a little confused by the proxy
We've been trying to reconcile various issues in config file Location
inheritance in httpd 2.2. In reading the core code, we've determined that
Locations truly are read and merged in order, and the most-specific (longest
Location strings) should go last. Therefore, we order our Locations in
Am I wrong? Is there some other reason why mod_proxy needs to go through the
aliases in forward order, maybe related to regex matching?
Just convention that the first match is the operative one (which is
also why the ! rules have to come before whatever would match them).
Could make it
Ah, I see. Iow, when you have proxypass or proxypassreverse directives in
server config, first match wins and per-directory merging works accordingly.
However, as in our case, when all proxypassreverse directives are instead
within Location tags, and it's always ProxyPassReverse / xxx, I don't
Anyway, we'll file a bug report later in the week with an example config and
proposed solution. As it is now, there's no way to properly use
ProxyPassReverse in a directory scope when you use inherited settings in
nested Locations with other modules. The Locations need to be in
least-specific to
On 06/14/2010 09:59 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Mon Jun 14 19:59:05 2010
New Revision: 954611
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=954611view=rev
Log:
- Introduce ap_log_cserror to allow mod_ssl to associate log messages to
different servers than c-base_server.
-
On 14.06.2010 21:45, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The asf-wide, site-dev team noticed our webring seems horribly dated,
just as the ASF list of 'apache resources' was. We should determine
how we might provide external/thirdparty links and under what set
of criteria.
The immediate question is;
I want to remove User, Group and ScoreBoardFile from the OS2 MPM.
The directives have an empty implementation ignore_cmd() and have only
been introduced for consistency with those MPMS which did support it.
In trunk User and Group are no longer MPM directives, they moved to
mod_unixd, and
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Dienstag, 15. Juni 2010 11:43
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Remove User, Group and ScoreBoardFile from mpmt_os2
I want to remove User, Group and ScoreBoardFile from
the OS2 MPM.
The directives have an empty implementation
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
On 06/14/2010 09:45 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The asf-wide, site-dev team noticed our webring seems horribly dated,
just as the ASF list of 'apache resources' was. We should determine
how we might provide
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:06 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Jun 15 13:06:14 2010
New Revision: 954862
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=954862view=rev
Log:
Fix obsolete reference to 2.1 in CHANGES.
Likely we still have to clean CHANGES from things backported
to
I noticed, that the values in conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf in parts differ
hugely from the corresponding MPM defaults.
IMHO activating conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf should be safe in the sense
that you don't get changed MPM behaviour as long as you don't change the
file contents. If we think the
On 6/15/2010 10:36 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I noticed, that the values in conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf in parts differ
hugely from the corresponding MPM defaults.
IMHO activating conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf should be safe in the sense
that you don't get changed MPM behaviour as long as you don't
On 6/15/2010 9:21 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
attached is a patch to prune 2.3.0 changes which were backported to
some 2.2.x release; look reasonable?
Looks reasonable, thanks for this effort.
On 15.06.2010 16:21, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:06 AM,rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Jun 15 13:06:14 2010
New Revision: 954862
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=954862view=rev
Log:
Fix obsolete reference to 2.1 in CHANGES.
Likely we still have to clean
On 15.06.2010 17:58, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/15/2010 10:36 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I noticed, that the values in conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf in parts differ
hugely from the corresponding MPM defaults.
IMHO activating conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf should be safe in the sense
that you don't get
On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
On 6/8/10 7:21 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
That said, if your server doesn't have work to do, ie
you're just a bit-shifter, then a simple async loop will win hands down.
We also found that even for resource intensive tasks
On Jun 6, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sunday 06 June 2010, Brian Pane wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm
wrote: [...]
We've also been playing with Varnish, one of the cooler things it
does is have the ability to suck up an entire response
On 6/15/2010 11:33 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Sorry Bill, don't get it here: what do you suggest? Applying the
existing values from conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf to the MPM source code?
Just suggesting we don't really need to 'normalize' these first. Discuss
the appropriate values on dev@ and commit
On 15.06.2010 18:30, Rainer Jung wrote:
Sorry for the noise, forget about the second addition, doesn't seem to
be the same thing (prepared statements vs. connection pools).
@@ -1131,11 +1082,6 @@ Changes with Apache 2.3.0
into the environment with the name AUTHENTICATE_COLUMN. This brings
On Monday 14 June 2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/14/2010 4:20 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
But I am not sure what introducing a new element in struct
apr_bucket_file would mean for ABI compatibility. On the one
hand, apr_bucket_file is public, on the other hand, there are
functions
On Tuesday 15 June 2010, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+AP_DECLARE(void) ap_log_cserror_(const char *file, int line, int
module_index, + int level,
apr_status_t status, + const
conn_rec *c, const server_rec *s,
+
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 15.06.2010 18:30, Rainer Jung wrote:
Sorry for the noise, forget about the second addition, doesn't seem to be
the same thing (prepared statements vs. connection pools).
@@ -1131,11 +1082,6 @@ Changes with Apache
- Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
I noticed, that the values in conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf in parts
differ
hugely from the corresponding MPM defaults.
IMHO activating conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf should be safe in the sense
that you don't get changed MPM behaviour as long as
The default configuration for various MPMs
differs from the example configuration file
conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf.
Before bringing those two in sync, I want
to propose the values we want to use as new
defaults as well as for the extras configuration
file.
Prefork
===conf default
As a broad general question - why not equivalent number of MaxClients
across all MPMs?
On 6/15/2010 4:03 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
The default configuration for various MPMs
differs from the example configuration file
conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf.
Before bringing those two in sync, I want
to
On 15.06.2010 22:51, Igor Galić wrote:
- Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
I noticed, that the values in conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf in parts
differ
hugely from the corresponding MPM defaults.
IMHO activating conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf should be safe in the sense
that you don't
- William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
As a broad general question - why not equivalent number of MaxClients
across all MPMs?
Because it might come expensive Memory-wise with some MPMs.
On 6/15/2010 4:03 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
The default configuration for various MPMs
On 15 Jun 2010, at 4:21 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
trunk CHANGES needs to track fixes/enhancements since the last alpha,
so the candidates for pruning would be in the section Changes with
Apache 2.3.0.
attached is a patch to prune 2.3.0 changes which were backported to
some 2.2.x release; look
I wonder if this thread is wrong enough for the topic:
Would it be possible to choose defaults for the MPMs based on
the available CPU(core)s and the Memory, rather than just hard
coding the values?
I doubt it's worth it and that we can make it work nicely. I think we
are
On 15.06.2010 23:09, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
As a broad general question - why not equivalent number of MaxClients
across all MPMs?
I was uncertain about that. Users often tend to try to fix performance
problems by adding concurrency to the web server. If your web server is
configured
On 15.06.2010 23:20, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 15 Jun 2010, at 4:21 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
trunk CHANGES needs to track fixes/enhancements since the last alpha,
so the candidates for pruning would be in the section Changes with
Apache 2.3.0.
attached is a patch to prune 2.3.0 changes which
On 6/15/2010 4:20 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
Worker/Event
conf default proposed
StartServers 23 2
MinSpareThreads 25 75 25
MaxSpareThreads 75 250100
MaxClients 150 400400
ThreadsPerChild
On 6/15/2010 4:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 15.06.2010 22:51, Igor Galić wrote:
I wonder if this thread is wrong enough for the topic:
Would it be possible to choose defaults for the MPMs based on
the available CPU(core)s and the Memory, rather than just hard
coding the values?
I doubt
On 6/15/2010 4:42 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 15.06.2010 23:09, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
As a broad general question - why not equivalent number of MaxClients
across all MPMs?
I was uncertain about that. Users often tend to try to fix performance
problems by adding concurrency to the web
Hi,
Am 16.06.2010 00:37, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Netware
===conf default proposed
StartThreads250 50 50
MinSpareThreads 25 10 25
MaxSpareThreads 250 100100
MaxThreads 1000 2048 1000
On 6/15/2010 7:27 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Am 16.06.2010 00:37, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Netware
===conf default proposed
StartThreads250 50 50
MinSpareThreads 25 10 25
MaxSpareThreads 250 100100
non-binding Win32 XP/Vista VC6 VC9
Jim Jagielski wrote:
+/- 1
[+1] Release httpd-2.3.6 as Alpha
Vote closes at 15:00 UTC on Wednesday June 16 2010.
APR 1.4.2
APU 1.3.9
APU 1.4.0-dev
Every module loads this time (lbmethods did not in 2.3.5 IIRC)
SSLCACertificateFile no longer errors for me
I'd
38 matches
Mail list logo
