On 08/16/2010 08:36 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Mon Aug 16 18:36:19 2010
> New Revision: 986090
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986090&view=rev
> Log:
> For backends which are HTTP/1.1, do a quick test (ping)
> of the "connection" via 100-Continue for reverse
> pro
On 08/17/2010 09:08 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 08/16/2010 08:36 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Mon Aug 16 18:36:19 2010
>> New Revision: 986090
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986090&view=rev
>> Log:
>> For backends which are HTTP/1.1, do a quick test (ping)
Hello list,
I've prepared some (mini-)patches for mod_fcgid 2.3.5 that I want to get rid
off (read: they can be included in the next release).
Here we go:
remove-FCGID_DIE_COMM_ERROR-processes
=
In an old posting[1] in the us...@httpd list I wrote about this
On 17.08.2010 16:43, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
New Revision: 986333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986333&view=rev
Log:
Further checks for non-body requests...
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c
Modified: httpd/httpd/t
On Aug 17, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 17.08.2010 16:43, j...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
>> New Revision: 986333
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986333&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Further checks for non-body requests...
>>
>> Modified:
On 17.08.2010 17:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 17.08.2010 16:43, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
New Revision: 986333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986333&view=rev
Log:
Further checks for non-body reques
On Aug 17, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 17.08.2010 16:43, j...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
>> New Revision: 986333
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986333&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Further checks for non-body requests...
>>
>> Modified:
On 17.08.2010 17:22, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 17.08.2010 16:43, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
New Revision: 986333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986333&view=rev
Log:
Further checks for non-body reques
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski
> Sent: Dienstag, 17. August 2010 17:22
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r986333 -
> /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> > On 17.08.2010 16:43, j..
>
> as we only want do_100_continue to be true *if* we have a request body,
My mistake for some reason I commented and coded the
reverse, even though I knew what it should have been...
Too much on my mind...
10 matches
Mail list logo