If somebody from mod_log_config wants to discuss with me to generalise
the code to be usable also without request_rec/server_req and pools, I
can try to do it cleanly for the first patch proposal.
Any idea why I cannot obtain the handlers via apr_hash_get()?
Or maybe what I could check to
Actually, the problem is that apr_table_get(r-subprocess_env, a) always
returns null.
I suppose that the problem lies in the request variable r.
I am using f-r where f is the ap_filter_t given as parameter to
do_pattmatch().
Should I use another one,
Thanks,
Nick
Original Message
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Nick Gearls wrote:
Actually, the problem is that apr_table_get(r-subprocess_env, a) always
returns null.
I suppose that the problem lies in the request variable r.
I am using f-r where f is the ap_filter_t given as parameter to
do_pattmatch().
Should I use another one,
Sorry, I was not clear enough.
mod_log_config provides CustomLog/LogFormat and should work very similar
to what mod_headers does. It should be relatively easy to make them use
the same code.
ErrorLog/ErrorLogFormat is provided by the core and works differently (due
to lack of request_rec,
On 06 Nov 2010, at 10:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I think I have made my intentions clear in my first mail from
October 23rd. But maybe I should have mentioned it also in the later
mails.
The grammar and in particular the string handling in the SSI
expression parser is so weird that it
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Sun Nov 7 14:35:21 2010
New Revision: 1032286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1032286view=rev
Log:
improve wording of some function descriptions
add explicit FIXME to an ancient issue
remove implicit
%D works, but, for instance, not %{proxy-sendcl}e which is set with
setenv proxy-sendcl.
I call process_tags() in do_pattmatch() right after the initialisations.
This may be the cause?
Should I call it inside substitute_filter()?
I tried but I got the same result :-(
Nick
Original
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:54 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Sun Nov 7 18:54:44 2010
New Revision: 1032345
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1032345view=rev
Log:
mark connection for close after the return from
ap_proxy_determine_connection()
before this revision:
Resending w/ GPG sig. Need at least a few sigs before I can
TR httpd 2.3.9-alpha!
Seemed about time to finally upgrade my key to 4096...
Just did it. Created and then signed by my old key.
So please go ahead and sign this new one as well; of
course, to be doubly-sure, feel free to grab me @ AC
On 07.11.2010 20:36, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Resending w/ GPG sig. Need at least a few sigs before I can
TR httpd 2.3.9-alpha!
Done. Isn't it for the moment enough that you signed it with your
already trusted key? Only when 1024 effectvely becomes breakable this
wouldn't be valid any longer.
$DAY job requires filtering the scoreboard for things like username, passwords,
credit card numbers (don't ask) and other sensitive information. Currently I
just added a patch to our build that adds a option function that I set in our
filtering module. While at ApacheCon I talked with Paul
This is handy when a module depends on another module at load time or
run time, and the config for that module needs to display a message
more helpful than the normal symbol-not-found or
optional-function-not-found or invalid-filter message.
The current kludge for generating an error message is
Cute. Always nice to have better error reporting.
On 08 Nov 2010, at 2:35 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
With the Error directive:
IfModule !mod_include.c
Error mod_foo requires mod_include! Use the LoadModule directive to
load mod_include.
/IfModule
$ ./httpd -t
Syntax error on line 486 of /home/trawick/inst/23/conf/httpd.conf:
mod_foo requires
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 08 Nov 2010, at 2:35 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
With the Error directive:
IfModule !mod_include.c
Error mod_foo requires mod_include! Use the LoadModule directive to
load mod_include.
/IfModule
$ ./httpd -t
Syntax
On Nov 7, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This is handy when a module depends on another module at load time or
run time, and the config for that module needs to display a message
more helpful than the normal symbol-not-found or
optional-function-not-found or invalid-filter message.
On Sun. 2010-11-07 at 08:29 PM EST, Sander Temme scte...@apache.org wrote:
Pardon my rust, but what actually makes the process error out?
Returning !nil?
Right, config handlers either return NULL or an error message, and that
fails startup.
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Sander Temme scte...@apache.org wrote:
On Nov 7, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This is handy when a module depends on another module at load time or
run time, and the config for that module needs to display a message
more helpful than the normal
On Nov 7, 2010, at 5:35 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+1. We also discussed last week the possibility that a module provides
functionality not captured in the config file, and server startup should
fail if that module is not loaded.
The example I remember discussing was some module (or even
On 11/06/2010 03:31 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Sat Nov 6 14:31:16 2010
New Revision: 1032073
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1032073view=rev
Log:
Replace ap_expr with a parser derived from mod_ssl's parser. Make mod_ssl use
the new parser. Rework ap_expr's public
21 matches
Mail list logo
