builds and all tests pass on linux w/ 2.2.11 w/ perl 5.8.8
i'll give it a spin on solaris sparc and x86 tomorrow.
Adam
On 11/25/2010 2:34 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After a year and a half, the apreq team would like to release version
2.13 of lib
Hi,
> My condolences. I have felt your pain.
Thanks ;)
I just read the documentation of mod_log_config 2.3 and some
logging-options have been added, to my pleasant surprise! I was
thinking I could use:
%a = client's IP address
%{remote}p = client's port
Would this pair uniquely identify one c
Hi Ted,
> This is much better done at the application level.
I am aware of that, but that is not an option unfortunately.
Cheers,
Andrej
This is much better done at the application level. Log a user id of some
kind (usually session cookie based). Then sort by cookie first, then by
time. The sorted file is what you need. For really large logs, some kind
of map-reduce is warranted.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Andrej van der
Hi,
I am looking for a way to deduct the concept of a "transaction" from
the Apache log. What I mean is that I want to group HTTP requests that
are sent by one particular client, for example when a user clicks a
link in the browser. Then I want to be able to group all the HTTP
requests that are th
Hi,
On Thursday 25 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
> Much better, results seem to be the same as Guenter's;
>
> \server\util_expr_eval.c(350) : error C2440: ':' : cannot convert
> from 'int (__stdcall *)(ap_expr_lookup_parms *)' to
> 'ap_expr_lookup_fn (__cdecl *)'
>
> \server\util_expr_eva
Examples, I'll have to hunt for, and maybe someone on-list will be able
to give a good place to start. Docs you can find at
http://httpd.apache.org/apreq/docs/libapreq2/index.html
On 25/11/2010 21:43, pierre laplante wrote:
> Is there any documentation or examples on how to used apreq from a C
pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After a year and a half, the apreq team would like to release version
2.13 of libapreq. Please test and vote on the following tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq2-2.13.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq2-2.13.tar.gz.asc
h
Hello Stefan,
Much better, results seem to be the same as Guenter's;
\server\util_expr_eval.c(350) : error C2440: ':' : cannot convert from 'int
(__stdcall *)(ap_expr_lookup_parms *)' to 'ap_expr_lookup_fn (__cdecl *)'
\server\util_expr_eval.c(350) : error C2440: '=' : cannot convert from
'ap_
No rush. Philip is out of town for the next 2 weeks and
I'm pretty sure the 3 votes you'll need are between you,
me, and him.
- Original Message
> From: Issac Goldstand
> To: apreq-...@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, November 25, 2010 7:15:17 AM
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1035412 -
>
Hence you should return a 500 as this signals the mod_proxy code that the
backend is broken and should be put in error state.
A 502 does not put the backend in error state (as you found out).
Regards
Rüdiger
I didn't realize this was the case - marking it in error inside
ap_proxy_http_proces
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Ruggeri
> Sent: Donnerstag, 25. November 2010 16:20
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Making mod_proxy_http more aware of SSL
>
> >
> > The loggers get in error state automatically when you call
> > ap_proxyerror with HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERR
The loggers get in error state automatically when you call
ap_proxyerror with HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR. No need to do it manually.
Regards
Rüdiger
The request goes into error state - that has never been the problem (502
is correct here). The real issue is that the proxy worker that served
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Ruggeri
> Sent: Donnerstag, 25. November 2010 16:01
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Making mod_proxy_http more aware of SSL
>
>
> On 11/25/2010 4:14 AM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote:
> > the following seems better:
> >
> >
> > +
On 11/25/2010 4:14 AM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote:
the following seems better:
+else if(strcmp(apr_table_get(backend->connection->notes, "SSL_connect_rv"),
"err") == 0) {
+return ap_proxyerror(r, HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR,
+
Hi Guenter,
thanks for the patch. It's the example of how I don't want to do it
:-). I don't want to have code specific to the module I modify (zend_*
in your patch).
Ondrej
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:10, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Hi Ondřej,
> Am 25.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
>>
>> since
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Ruggeri [mailto:drugg...@primary.net]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 25. November 2010 06:04
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Making mod_proxy_http more aware of SSL
>
> All;
> I opened up bug 50332 to attach/document these patches. The patch
> causes
Hi Ondřej,
Am 25.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
since people keep asking for that I'll ask here.
Is there a generic way how to modify configuration of some other
module from within f.e. mod-vhost-* modules? Somethink like per_dir
configuration?
I know it can be done, but you'll have to kno
Stefan,
Am 25.11.2010 08:14, schrieb Stefan Fritsch:
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Here we go, cannot test beyond libhttp
warning aren't a big deal but showing them anyway with errors
Thanks. Please try the attached patch in addition to all changes so
far.
please go ahead
Hi,
since people keep asking for that I'll ask here.
Is there a generic way how to modify configuration of some other
module from within f.e. mod-vhost-* modules? Somethink like per_dir
configuration?
I know it can be done, but you'll have to know the data structures and
link with header files o
20 matches
Mail list logo
