Will mod_session_crypto be included in 2.4?

2010-12-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Mod_session_crypto requires a new release of APU 1.4.x or APR trunk, which now includes APU. After reading this thread [1], I'm not sure about your plan for this module. Is the plan to: - take mod_session_crypto out of 2.4? - keep it and base 2.4 on a new release of APU 1.4.x? - or use a new re

Re: Relative vs Absolute Options (PR 33078)

2010-12-24 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/24/2010 12:25 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I'd like to apply the attached patch to trunk. >> It's based on the one in PR#33078, disallowing the mixing >> of relative and absolute options (for combinations which >> really d

Re: Relative vs Absolute Options (PR 33078)

2010-12-24 Thread Igor Galić
- "Rich Bowen" wrote: > On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I'd like to apply the attached patch to trunk. > > It's based on the one in PR#33078, disallowing the mixing > > of relative and absolute options (for combinations which > > really don't make

Re: Some love for balancer manager?

2010-12-24 Thread Rich Bowen
On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: During Rich's ApacheCon presentation he mentioned that some much needed love for the balancer manager was on its way... is anyone working on this currently? I'm not seeing anything in the released alphas and would be happy to be a guinea p

Re: Relative vs Absolute Options (PR 33078)

2010-12-24 Thread Rich Bowen
On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Igor Galić wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to apply the attached patch to trunk. It's based on the one in PR#33078, disallowing the mixing of relative and absolute options (for combinations which really don't make any sense). This "feature" has been proven to be very

Re: mod_ssl ssl_util_stapling.c warnings

2010-12-24 Thread Igor Galić
> > More significantly the code hasn't been tested extensively "in the > field" > > so there may be problems that have yet to be uncovered. > > That's a fair point. > > > My personal opinion would be to, at least initially, require an > explicit > > directive to enable it and leave the option in

Relative vs Absolute Options (PR 33078)

2010-12-24 Thread Igor Galić
Hi folks, I'd like to apply the attached patch to trunk. It's based on the one in PR#33078, disallowing the mixing of relative and absolute options (for combinations which really don't make any sense). This "feature" has been proven to be very costly: in support hours - which is why I'd like to