Would it make sense in trunk to add, for symmetry,
ap_run_pre_read_request() ? I can foresee a number of
situations where it would be useful and now would
be the time to add it...
Unless I hear otherwise, I'll do so in a few days.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:31:29 -0500
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Would it make sense in trunk to add, for symmetry,
ap_run_pre_read_request() ? I can foresee a number of
situations where it would be useful and now would
be the time to add it...
Unless I hear otherwise, I'll do so
On Jan 27, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:31:29 -0500
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Would it make sense in trunk to add, for symmetry,
ap_run_pre_read_request() ? I can foresee a number of
situations where it would be useful and now would
be the time to
I have been developing an application using apache 2.2 on linux 2.6. My test
environment creates a very heavy workload and puts a strain on every thing.
I would get good performance for a while and as the load ramped up, performance
would quickly get very bad. Erratically, transactions
On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
I have been developing an application using apache 2.2 on linux 2.6. My test
environment creates a very heavy workload and puts a strain on every thing.
I would get good performance for a while and as the load ramped up,
performance
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
I have been developing an application using apache 2.2 on linux 2.6. My
test environment creates a very heavy workload and puts a strain on every
thing.
I would get good
Looping in APR as well...
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
I noticed that ap_queue_pop removes elements from the queue LIFO rather
than FIFO. Also noticed that
I see that the changes described below were applied to the trunk worker and
event MPM code.
Would you consider applying it to the 2.2x branch? I will do so myself and
test in my env.
Many thanks,
David Dabbs
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: