ap_run_post_read_request

2011-01-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
Would it make sense in trunk to add, for symmetry, ap_run_pre_read_request() ? I can foresee a number of situations where it would be useful and now would be the time to add it... Unless I hear otherwise, I'll do so in a few days.

Re: ap_run_post_read_request

2011-01-27 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:31:29 -0500 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Would it make sense in trunk to add, for symmetry, ap_run_pre_read_request() ? I can foresee a number of situations where it would be useful and now would be the time to add it... Unless I hear otherwise, I'll do so

Re: ap_run_post_read_request

2011-01-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 27, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:31:29 -0500 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Would it make sense in trunk to add, for symmetry, ap_run_pre_read_request() ? I can foresee a number of situations where it would be useful and now would be the time to

Performance fix in event mpm

2011-01-27 Thread Jim Van Fleet
I have been developing an application using apache 2.2 on linux 2.6. My test environment creates a very heavy workload and puts a strain on every thing. I would get good performance for a while and as the load ramped up, performance would quickly get very bad. Erratically, transactions

Re: Performance fix in event mpm

2011-01-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote: I have been developing an application using apache 2.2 on linux 2.6. My test environment creates a very heavy workload and puts a strain on every thing. I would get good performance for a while and as the load ramped up, performance

Re: Performance fix in event mpm

2011-01-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote: I have been developing an application using apache 2.2 on linux 2.6. My test environment creates a very heavy workload and puts a strain on every thing. I would get good

apr_queue_pop/push (Was: Re: Performance fix in event mpm)

2011-01-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
Looping in APR as well... On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote: I noticed that ap_queue_pop removes elements from the queue LIFO rather than FIFO. Also noticed that

RE: Performance fix in event mpm

2011-01-27 Thread David Dabbs
I see that the changes described below were applied to the trunk worker and event MPM code. Would you consider applying it to the 2.2x branch? I will do so myself and test in my env. Many thanks, David Dabbs -Original Message- From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] Sent: