On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 05:55:44PM +0200, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
t/apache/if_sections.t needs the proxy module, t/modules/filter.t needs
mod_case_filter.
Thanks, committed!
Regards, Joe
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 05:51:42PM +0200, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
Hi,
t/modules/proxy.t of the test framework contains at line 32 the following 2
tests:
$r = GET(/reverse/modules/cgi/nph-102.pl);
ok t_cmp($r-code, 200, reverse proxy to nph-102);
ok t_cmp($r-content, this is
On Monday, April 18, 2011 10:36:13 Joe Orton wrote:
If you change the CGI script to send a 100 rather than 102, does it
work? LWP should treat all 1xx as interim responses so I'd say it is an
LWP bug.
It is certainly triggered by the LWP version upgrade. I also agree that it's a
bug in
there doesn't seem to be any immediate demand for renegotiation
support, so it makes the most sense to leave it optional-to-enable
rather than optional-to-disable.
If you want to protect some parts of your site with client
authentication, then you need to enable insecure renegotiation to
On Sunday 17 April 2011, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 18:24:28 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Suggestion - an EXEC_ON_READ 'DynamicModulesMax' directive, which
would let us conf_vector_length = total_modules +
dyn_modules_max; after the read_config, and finally lock down
On Monday 18 April 2011, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
On Monday, April 18, 2011 10:36:13 Joe Orton wrote:
If you change the CGI script to send a 100 rather than 102, does
it work? LWP should treat all 1xx as interim responses so I'd
say it is an LWP bug.
It is certainly triggered by the LWP