On 05/25/2011 02:27 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
I attached the patch to a bug opened by Cameron Stokes
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841
Just a quick note on the first thing I saw:
+//worker->lbfactor = atoi(val);
+worker->lbfactor = strtol(val, NULL, 10);
On May 24, 2011, at 8:27 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Jim, if you wouldn't mind reviewing both and suggesting one to be cleaned up
> for a patch generated against trunk. I'm happy to volunteer the effort to
> adjust my patch or at least take care of that bug that's out there still.
>
Will d
I've reviewed the other
patch https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841 and I had a
similar idea, wondering if the route-only intent would happen if I tried to set
lbfactor=0 but it only allowed values 1-100 and I worried about the complexity
of changing the lbmethod formulae so
On 5/25/2011 5:41 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/25/2011 02:27 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
I attached the patch to a bug opened by Cameron Stokes
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841
Just a quick note on the first thing I saw:
+ //worker->lbfactor = atoi(val);
+ worker->lbfac
+1
Do you have commit privileges on Apache-Test?
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> I noticed, that the SMOKE change in 1.36 also introduced a new sorting
> behaviour. In the change the test suite was running by default using the
> repeat order, that means the tests were order
